Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Smoking ban: Only 6 law enforcement visits so far

By Douglas Burns | 09.04.08 | 3:01 pm

Iowa’s sweeping indoor smoking ban has been in effect for two months now but public health officials report that only six “law enforcement” visits have been made to places believed to be in violation. The Iowa Department of Public Health  (IDPH)– charged with overseeing the law and in the process of reviewing draft rules — views the implementation as a success so far. State officials say they are working with local law enforcement in some places where businesses and knowingly violating the law.

Here is the IDPH news release:

In the first two months since the Smokefree Air Act went into effect, the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) has received more than 4,300 calls and e-mails from business owners and the public. The vast majority—about 80 percent—have been from people with questions about how to comply with the new law. Fewer than 1,000 have been complaints about potential violations of the law, and only 6 have resulted in a visit by law enforcement.

“These figures reflect just how effective education has been in enforcing this new law,” said IDPH Director Tom Newton. “There are a limited number of cases, however, where we have had to move beyond education in our enforcement efforts.”

The Smokefree Air Act stipulates that the law be enforced by IDPH or its designee. In nearly every case, compliance has been achieved by working with business owners and others to help them understand their requirements under the law. This has included making phone calls, providing fact sheets, and in a few cases, sending formal letters of potential violations. Recently, the department has been working with the Attorney General’s Office, the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division, and local law enforcement to actively pursue a small number of businesses that are intentionally breaking the law.

Lynn Walding, administrator of the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division, emphasized the need to ensure that those few establishments do comply with the law. “Iowa’s liquor license holders are held to a high standard, are subject to strict federal, state and local regulation, and are expected to comply with all such laws. This includes Iowa’s Smokefree Air Act.” Walding added that possible penalties for violating the law include a civil fine up to $1,000, a suspension of the liquor license up to one year, or the revocation of the license.

Comments

  • generalsn

    Here in Chicago, seven bars that I know of within two miles of my place, maybe more, ignore the ban. Many of the people who are suposed to enforce it are regular customers. Instead of just closing shop, most bars are willing to risk a fine to stay in business. The customers pay the bills, not the state. Mayor Daley calls the ban “silly”

  • daddysteve

    Here's a thought; how about installing a ceiling vent? How much would it cost to install better ventilation? No, let's enforce our socialist meddling at the point of a gun. It's easy to push around a minority (smokers) with the the power of big govt. C'mon, smoking has been around for HUNDREDS of years. Socialist sheep.

  • snowbird

    A smokeless environmentI believe that non-smokers, like anyone else, have this right.

    But how far does that right extend?

    Should it take priority over someone else's rights?

    Court houses, publicly owned buildings and anywhere else an
    individual might be forced to go should properly be included in any
    smoking law.
    What should not be included are places located in or on private property,

    providing an individual is not compelled by necessity or law,

    to frequent or work at that specific location.
    Second-hand smoke is not a statistically significant health risk.
    Smoking laws mean: It is against the law to use or permit a legal product on 'private' property.
    Is this the American way??
    There are two reason for smoing bans and neither of them are about health.
    Quarantine/isolate the smoker.
    Denormaile smoking .
    Unfortunately, the hospitality iscaught in the cross-fire.

    http://smokersclubinc.com
    http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com

    Thomas Laprade
    Thunder Bay, Ont.
    Ph. 807 3457258

  • snowbird

    A smokeless environmentI believe that non-smokers, like anyone else, have this right.

    But how far does that right extend?

    Should it take priority over someone else's rights?

    Court houses, publicly owned buildings and anywhere else an
    individual might be forced to go should properly be included in any
    smoking law.
    What should not be included are places located in or on private property,

    providing an individual is not compelled by necessity or law,

    to frequent or work at that specific location.
    Second-hand smoke is not a statistically significant health risk.
    Smoking laws mean: It is against the law to use or permit a legal product on 'private' property.
    Is this the American way??
    There are two reason for smoing bans and neither of them are about health.
    Quarantine/isolate the smoker.
    Denormaile smoking .
    Unfortunately, the hospitality iscaught in the cross-fire.

    http://smokersclubinc.com
    http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com

    Thomas Laprade
    Thunder Bay, Ont.
    Ph. 807 3457258

Categories & Tags: Blog| |

Switch to our mobile site