You are absolutely correct. Compared to Ralph Nader, the two major party candidates put together have not even come close to the service provided for the American people. Similarly, Ralph Nader offers a strategy with real solutions, not meaningless slogans about change when all we have seen for many years now is just more of the same. Anyone who wants to know more about Ralph Nader should get a copy of the video “An Unreasonable Man” and watch it. If one is looking for a competent, intelligent person with real integrity, one needs to look no further. Furthermore, if one thinks that the USA is a model of democracy, excluding someone like Ralph Nader from debating in a nationally televised debate should make one think otherwise.

Best wishes,

Gary Rabetoy

You are absolutely correct. Compared to Ralph Nader, the two major party candidates put together have not even come close to the service provided for the American people. Similarly, Ralph Nader offers a strategy with real solutions, not meaningless slogans about change when all we have seen for many years now is just more of the same. Anyone who wants to know more about Ralph Nader should get a copy of the video “An Unreasonable Man” and watch it. If one is looking for a competent, intelligent person with real integrity, one needs to look no further. Furthermore, if one thinks that the USA is a model of democracy, excluding someone like Ralph Nader from debating in a nationally televised debate should make one think otherwise.

Best wishes,

Gary Rabetoy

I still do not understand this “spoiler” concept that some people latch onto. If you think about it, either we’re all spoilers, taking votes away from each other as competitors, or none of us are spoilers (again, we’re competitors). To label someone as a spoiler is something of political bigotry. If someone is working hard to bring about the change they want to see in their beloved country, all while doing it fairly with the American ideal of democracy in mind, why would you demonize them for trying to serve you so passionately and sincerely? Nader, for example, has served the entire U.S. population for decades with such landmark legislation as the Clean Water Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and laws protecting the safety of coal miners. Take a moment to ask yourself, amidst the wanning Obama craze, what on earth Barack has done that deserves any kind of great merit?

I think Ralph has some great ideas, such as aggressively pursuing solar energy for a sustainable energy source. I think everybody wins with this stance: the leftists get clean, green, renewable energy while the conservatives get a brand new industry which demands well educated workers and, in turn, creates tons of new jobs. The U.S. would finally get that huge “math & science” education kick-start that has, up until now, been tepid and, sadly, keeping us behind in the global marketplace against the likes of Asia and Europe. There’s no doubt we can compete, given our vast amount of raw skills. Plus, with the green energy, we avoid health problems for the public (which affects EVERYONE–rich, poor, middle class) caused by pollution.

If you’re looking for the same old, same old, then check out Obama or McCain. But, if you’re looking for the “Experience” & “Hope” hybrid, then look no further than Nader. After all, why support a candidate who doesn’t support you?

Nader/Gonzalez ’08

http://www.VoteNader.org

Best,
Nigel

I still do not understand this “spoiler” concept that some people latch onto. If you think about it, either we're all spoilers, taking votes away from each other as competitors, or none of us are spoilers (again, we're competitors). To label someone as a spoiler is something of political bigotry. If someone is working hard to bring about the change they want to see in their beloved country, all while doing it fairly with the American ideal of democracy in mind, why would you demonize them for trying to serve you so passionately and sincerely? Nader, for example, has served the entire U.S. population for decades with such landmark legislation as the Clean Water Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and laws protecting the safety of coal miners. Take a moment to ask yourself, amidst the wanning Obama craze, what on earth Barack has done that deserves any kind of great merit?

I think Ralph has some great ideas, such as aggressively pursuing solar energy for a sustainable energy source. I think everybody wins with this stance: the leftists get clean, green, renewable energy while the conservatives get a brand new industry which demands well educated workers and, in turn, creates tons of new jobs. The U.S. would finally get that huge “math & science” education kick-start that has, up until now, been tepid and, sadly, keeping us behind in the global marketplace against the likes of Asia and Europe. There's no doubt we can compete, given our vast amount of raw skills. Plus, with the green energy, we avoid health problems for the public (which affects EVERYONE–rich, poor, middle class) caused by pollution.

If you're looking for the same old, same old, then check out Obama or McCain. But, if you're looking for the “Experience” & “Hope” hybrid, then look no further than Nader. After all, why support a candidate who doesn't support you?

Nader/Gonzalez '08

http://www.VoteNader.org

Best,
Nigel