Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Iowa Republicans oppose AIDS funding in Congress

By admin | 07.25.08 | 1:56 pm

It may come as no surprise to those familiar with U.S. Rep. Steve King’s voting record that the Western Iowa congressman voted against a reuathorization of funding for a program to combat AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria abroad, but U.S. Rep. Tom Latham and Sen. Chuck Grassley made votes against AIDS funding this week, as well — albeit in a less public way.

Although Latham and Grassley both voted for final bills once they were put up for a vote, Latham opposed bringing the bill to the floor for consideration, and Grassley voted to strip funding from the bill before the Senate voted on it.

It is not uncommon to try to kill a bill that you know you will have to vote for if it actually comes up, because typically voters only pay attention to final votes and not the procedural mumbo-jumbo that comes first.  The final bills passed by fairly large, bipartisan majorities.  Only 8 Republicans in the House voted to consider the bill, but once the bill was put up for a vote, 75 Republicans jumped on board.  In the Senate, 30 Republicans and 1 Democrat voted to strip funding from the bill, but after that group failed, only 16 Republicans (and 0 Democrats) voted against the final bill.

Comments

  • Chase Watch

    Chase — you are an idiot — you are saying he voted against it before he voted for it?!?!? (sounds like you gots the John Kerry reasoning there) I think you are falling all over yourself with your hate for the GOP. Seems like the rule is that if someobe votes for an actual bill then they voted for it. The rule could have contained a whole bunch of things that people would have voted against — including briging a bill up without going through the proper procedures. Is it just me or has the Iowa “independent” taken a serious turn away from that with Chase leading the way?

  • Chase Watch

    Chase — you are an idiot — you are saying he voted against it before he voted for it?!?!? (sounds like you gots the John Kerry reasoning there) I think you are falling all over yourself with your hate for the GOP. Seems like the rule is that if someobe votes for an actual bill then they voted for it. The rule could have contained a whole bunch of things that people would have voted against — including briging a bill up without going through the proper procedures. Is it just me or has the Iowa “independent” taken a serious turn away from that with Chase leading the way?

  • RegularJoe

    Ad hominems from the Nutter Zone again, I see.

    Some of us like to know the back story. There doesn’t seem to be a ‘rule’ requiring reporting on the final vote only (at least I didn’t see it in The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law…I didn’t check Chicago). Perhaps you imagined it, or maybe the meds haven’t kicked in yet.

    It could be that a bunch of repubs really tried hard to stop this thing, and when they failed they also capitulated for political cover. Yep, they voted against it before they voted for it. They reason like Kerry because they’re in the same biz and that’s how the game is played. Your ilk will claim in the end that they voted for it in some circles, but to their like-minded base they’ll claim they really tried hard to stop it. Chase just called ‘em on it. It only seems bad to you because this time your methodology was used against you. Sorry ’bout that…not.

    Oh, and Watch – you’re a douche.

    Wow, some people’s kids…

  • RegularJoe

    Ad hominems from the Nutter Zone again, I see.

    Some of us like to know the back story. There doesn't seem to be a 'rule' requiring reporting on the final vote only (at least I didn't see it in The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law…I didn't check Chicago). Perhaps you imagined it, or maybe the meds haven't kicked in yet.

    It could be that a bunch of repubs really tried hard to stop this thing, and when they failed they also capitulated for political cover. Yep, they voted against it before they voted for it. They reason like Kerry because they're in the same biz and that's how the game is played. Your ilk will claim in the end that they voted for it in some circles, but to their like-minded base they'll claim they really tried hard to stop it. Chase just called 'em on it. It only seems bad to you because this time your methodology was used against you. Sorry 'bout that…not.

    Oh, and Watch – you're a douche.

    Wow, some people's kids…

Categories & Tags: Blog|

Switch to our mobile site