Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Flood funding could return to the realm of politics

By Jason Hancock | 07.24.08 | 10:48 am

Two stories in this morning’s Des Moines Register could be the beginning of more headaches for Gov. Chet Culver.

Iowa Gov. Chet Culver

Iowa Gov. Chet Culver

The first concerns the American Red Cross disputing Culver’s estimates on how many houses in Iowa were damaged by flood waters. Culver told Congressional leaders that 32,000 homes were damaged by tornadoes and floods this spring and asked for $1.2 billion in federal aid to fund rebuilding efforts.

But the number of houses Culver cited is more than double the estimate calculated by the American Red Cross, which reported that 12,302 homes in Iowa had some type of flood-related damage, and that another 704 were damaged by tornadoes.

Now, two taxpayer watchdog groups, Citizens Against Government Waste and Taxpayers for Common Sense, are on the case and say the numbers appear to be inflated for the specific purpose of getting more cash from the federal government.

“You know what’s going on? Everybody is screaming big numbers because they’re just trying to maximize the potential reimbursements that they might get from FEMA or the federal government or however this might be organized by our political leaders,” said Iowa State University economics professor Dave Swenson.

The second story discusses the flooding could actually be an economic stimulus to the state.

After the 1993 floods, federal grants and loans pumped almost $1.4 billion into the state’s economy for rebuilding and flood prevention efforts, while the state’s portion amounted to less than $15 million.

The influx of federal money created jobs and helped pay for rebuilding projects. The projects, in turn, spurred the economy and indirectly funneled more money to the state through additional income taxes and sales taxes, among other sources.

It hasn’t been the smoothest second year in office for Culver. He’s been a part of several high profile feuds with Republicans and legislative leaders from his own party, and his approval ratings continue to hover just below 50 percent. Then he seemed to alienate organized labor by vetoing a collective bargaining bill they have long sought after and finally got the legislature to pass.

But most of those critics were silenced after the flooding, with almost universal praise for Culver’s handling of one of the worst natural disasters in Iowa’s history. But now, an issue that seemed to be above politics could come plummeting down into the fray, just in time for a special legislative session to deal with the flooding that Culver said would most likely take place in September.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • Douglas Shackelford

    Arguing about how much damage there was and who should pony up the money to pay for it is the equivalent of trying to “lock the barn door after the horse already got away.”

    There are, of course, many sources for flood damage estimates. NOAA puts the annual “paid” flood damage at around $6 billion annually. Other estimates place the paid damages at around 20% of the actual damages. Still other numbers say that 60% of all damage from severe weather is flood related and that 75% of flood damage is caused by flood water that is less than 3′ deep.

    Add all that up and it becomes pretty clear that money spent to prevent flood damage has a tremendous opportunity to deliver significant returns. However, the long term major engineering projects usually touted as great accomplishments by most politicos, take decades to complete. In the meantime there goes another $5 or $10 billion in losses from the next dozen or so flood events.

    Every flood threatened community in the US must begin to realize that the need for robust, effective emergency flood protection is real. They must also eliminate sandbags and earthen barriers from the equation. These archaic efforts are unreliable and ineffective, require tremendous amounts of time, manpower and resources. There are new technologies now available (you can view one of the systems at http://www.floodwalls.com) that are less costly, more effective, proven that can be deployed in one 10th the time and at lower cost. These new systems have no negative environmental impact, no long term negative health concerns and can be deployed and redeployed multiple times with no loss of effectiveness. Spend $10 million save $10 billion, seems like an argument with merit.

  • Douglas Shackelford

    Arguing about how much damage there was and who should pony up the money to pay for it is the equivalent of trying to “lock the barn door after the horse already got away.”

    There are, of course, many sources for flood damage estimates. NOAA puts the annual “paid” flood damage at around $6 billion annually. Other estimates place the paid damages at around 20% of the actual damages. Still other numbers say that 60% of all damage from severe weather is flood related and that 75% of flood damage is caused by flood water that is less than 3' deep.

    Add all that up and it becomes pretty clear that money spent to prevent flood damage has a tremendous opportunity to deliver significant returns. However, the long term major engineering projects usually touted as great accomplishments by most politicos, take decades to complete. In the meantime there goes another $5 or $10 billion in losses from the next dozen or so flood events.

    Every flood threatened community in the US must begin to realize that the need for robust, effective emergency flood protection is real. They must also eliminate sandbags and earthen barriers from the equation. These archaic efforts are unreliable and ineffective, require tremendous amounts of time, manpower and resources. There are new technologies now available (you can view one of the systems at http://www.floodwalls.com) that are less costly, more effective, proven that can be deployed in one 10th the time and at lower cost. These new systems have no negative environmental impact, no long term negative health concerns and can be deployed and redeployed multiple times with no loss of effectiveness. Spend $10 million save $10 billion, seems like an argument with merit.

Categories & Tags: Blog| | | |

Switch to our mobile site