City officials in Memphis, Tenn., are so fired up they’ve filed a lawsuit charging Wells Fargo &Co. with discriminatory lending practices.The allegations they are making are almost identical to those leveled here in Iowa, where a study found that minority homeowners in Des Moines were three times more likely to receive high-cost subprime mortgage loans from the mortgage giant than white homeowners.
The New York Times reports:
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Tennessee, marshaled a raft of statistics to argue that Wells Fargo offered one lending reality for whites and another for blacks. In Shelby County, which includes Memphis, one of every eight Wells Fargo loans in predominantly black neighborhoods resulted in foreclosure, compared with only one in 59 such loans in white neighborhoods, the lawsuit said.
Such charges, if proven, amount to reverse redlining — marketing expensive loan products specifically to black customers.
For anyone who’s been following the reporting of The Washington Independent’s Mary Kane on Wells Fargo, this should come as no surprise. First, there was that Cleveland case in which Wells was found to be violating public nuisance laws by failing to clean up its foreclosed properties. Next came the charges from the state of Illinois that Wells had targeted Latino residents for subprime loans, even in cases when potential borrowers could afford less expensive options. Then came the California-based class-action lawsuit alleging subprime discrimination against the bank. And finally, Mary uncovered the bank’s alleged strategy of hiring high-profile black figures such as Tavis Smiley to lure potential black borrowers to “Wealth Building” seminars, where Wells employees would be waiting to sign attendees up for more expensive subprime loans, according to a lawsuit filed by the Illinois attorney general.
So far, there has been no legal action taken against Wells Fargo in Iowa.
Mike Lillis covers Congress for The Washington Independent, a Center for Independent Media site.