Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Commission on Status of African Americans Forges Ahead with Plan Amid Criticism

By Dana Boone | 06.08.08 | 11:57 pm

The publisher of the state’s oldest African-American newspaper expressed concerns in a recent Iowa Bystander issue about the Iowa Commission on the Status of African Americans’ Ongoing Covenant with Black Iowa.

Jerald Brantley, in a May 19 column titled “From the pen of JB,” wrote: “Let’s talk about gatekeepers and their negative effect on our community . . .Take for instance the Commission on the Status of African Americans. Now we have this Covenant with Black Iowa but do we really know what’s going on with it or what the commission is doing to further the mission, since we’ve heard no more? It’s because we have a gatekeeper that appears to have changed from being for the people to now being sucked into the old normal, that old mind set — “I’m the show . . not the message” — bad move.”

The commission’s Division Administrator Abraham Funchess, who said he was aware of Brantley’s comments, stressed the plan is moving forward despite some “gaps” in communication. Brantley didn’t return phone calls and emails to Iowa Independent seeking comment. “Community work is painstaking. It’s a slow process,” Funchess said. “Oftentimes there’s not a lot of reward in it. It certainly doesn’t help when we engage in demobilizing politics that in many ways suggest the community, the nebulous entity called community, has the same class and political consciousness. We have differentiated individuals within this community who have their own agendas. It’s going to require a lot of work to accomplish what we want to with the OCBI imitative.”

The commission is in the midst of a five-year plan to study and improve the lives of blacks in 10 cities, including Des Moines, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo, Davenport, Dubuque, Sioux City, Fort Madison, Burlington, Iowa City and Fort Dodge. The project is focused on education, youth, economic development, political involvement, spirituality, justice issues, housing and health care.

A disparity study about city contracts is underway in Davenport and project coordinators, whose role is to mobilize community interest and solicit community-driven proposals, recently have been hired in six of the target cities, he said.

“All valid criticism is welcome because accountability is a necessity,” Funchess said. “We have to be prepared to respond accordingly so that people are equipped with the best and most accurate information in order to engage in the work.”

Funchess added: “We have done some work already that is unprecedented. Never has there been a campaign to organize people. We have [in the past] talked about what people are feeling, but now the emphasis is on the plan so that necessary funding can flow to the community.”

The commission last month discussed the plan via its large statewide email network. The commission awarded the city of Davenport $75,000 in matching funds for a disparity study. The California-based Mason Tillman Associates, Ltd., is conducting the 10-month study to address the following questions, particularly in the areas of construction:

*  Is there a disparity between the number of qualified minority, women and disadvantaged-owned firms willing and able to perform a particular service and the number of such firms actually engaged by the city?

*  Has the city engaged in practices that have prevented or deterred minority, women and disadvantaged business owners from participating fairly and equally in goods and services contracts?

*  Has the city passively participated in a system of racial exclusion practiced by elements of the business community?

* Has the city fully utilized their opportunities to provide race and gender neutral measures?  Will additional race and gender neutral measures sufficiently remove any identified barriers?

* Are race and gender based remedies warranted?

“We think the model will provide a template for other cities,” including Des Moines and elsewhere,” Funchess said.

In an April 8 Quad City Times story by Tory Brecht, Davenport Mayor Bill Gluba praised the study, saying: “We want to make sure everyone is receiving a fair shake in procuring contracts,” Gluba said. “We are proud of our ethnic diversity. If everyone gets a piece of the action, everyone prospers. And this is the beginning of that.”

Community members in the target cities are encouraged to speak with project coordinators about recommendations they have that potentially could improve the lives of blacks. The goal is to get blacks focused on their most troubling areas of concern, create proposals to study or fix the problems and submit written proposals to the commission. The commission will seek money from the Iowa Legislature to pay for the projects, he said. Existing projects also are eligible to become part of the plan, Funchess said.

The project coordinators in Des Moines are Gretchen Woods, youth adviser of the Des Moines Chapter of the NAACP and Kim Carr-Irvin, of Creative Visions.

A community meeting will be held in late June in Des Moines to discuss the plan with the community, he said. A time and date have not been set.

“I want people to know that we’ve got a lot of work,” Funchess said. “There’s still much work to do . . . but we do have good leaders in Ft. Dodge, Burlington and Des Moines, in terms of the project coordinators.”

Comments

  • ialawyer

    Impact contracts Minority contractors are traditionally non union.  Large municipal contracts often have “Impact Agreements” requiring union labor.  These agreements equally benefit both local unions and the cities.

  • cna you spell pander?

    can you spell pander? The goal is to get blacks focused on their most troubling areas of concern, create proposals to study or fix the problems and submit written proposals to the commission. The commission will seek money from the Iowa Legislature to pay for the projects, he said.

    R U Kidding me?  What a bunch of silly blather.  What does this really mean in practical terms? It’s just another money grab that will bear no fruit. How many studies?  How many proposals?  How many commissions on status?  How much more taxpayer money?  What is that magic bullet?

    Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are current barometers.  Just get up off the couch, get your high school diploma, don’t commit crimes, don’t do drugs, follow the rules, be polite.

    There’s your study.  Save the money.  What a bunch of lazy asses trying to make it someone elses fault.

  • dellmar

    Response to Impact Contractors & Pander “Impact Contractors” I agree with many of his/her points… Yes, in most cases minority contractors are traditionally non union.  Hey, lets go a step further and talk about why?  Unions are the working man’s friend… right?  If you know anything about our country history you will know that african americans have always had challenges breaking into unions.  Let me be the first to say that unions are not all the same.  There is a big difference from the teachers union and construction unions.  To the person who wrote “Impact Contractors” did you know that the Association of General Contractors (AGC “big union”) is against the Disparity Study in Davenport.  Why is that… because it is not business as usual.  It is the first step in shaking up the way the construction pie is cut.  This is the first study of this nature to be done in this state.  You ever wonder why the Kansas City, Chicago, Minnapolis, St. Louis cities of the world are doing what we should be doing in this state with regard to supporting diversity on public funded construction sites.  The answer is they have done this same study 10 to 15 years ago.  Let me also say that the US Supreme Court requires agencies wanting to pursue agressive affirmative action programs like maditory goals (that would require minorities to be hired and contracted with) to do this type of study. 

    To person who wrote “Impact Contractors” I disagree with one thing however…”Impact Agreements” do require union labor and I agree it is not fair, but do not for one moment accept that cities benefit from them.  You know as I know, that union labor comes with union rules and that means that guys and gals who are in one job category can not work in another even if that means they have to stand around and wait until someone else can pick the lumber and take it to their work area.  The stories go on… and maybe one could argue that non companies are not more cost efficient, but the fact is the way construction unions use rules on their work sites effect cost and these cost impact projects and in return effects the value of our taxpayers dollars used to fund these projects.  It is our fault (as citizens) if we let the union lobby out weight the importance and value of working class small business owners, taxpayer and citizens.

    It is easy to put all your frustration in one pot, but that is just not the way to change the world or at least change the way business in done around the state.  We have to fight for our politicans and political parties to break them away from taking money from the lobbies.  Honestly how can we expect our democratic party to hold construction unions accountable when many of their campaign contributions come from these same unions.  Should we go Republican… the problem still exist.  We need to focus on issue, we need to work with both parties and insure that our community is active in the issues rather than the party.

    To the person who wrote “Pandering” I find your comments the most troubling of all, because I know our community doesn’t have a chance if we don’t have you on board.  This work may seem like a bunch of silly blather, but let me share with you that there are men and women that have placed there lives and livelyhood on the promise that not only will the city come through with a fairshare of contracting oppertunity, but that finally the Iowa Department of Transportation will do the same.  That other larger cities in the state will do the same.  You want to know “What does this really mean in practical terms?”  It means that we can finally hurdle a barrier that was placed on our community’s business people 20 years ago when we (as citizen) allowed affirmative action policies to be villianized and scaled back under the hood of reverse discrimination.  To the person who wrote “Pandering” can’t you see… that is what they want, they pray on in-fighting and they hope that we insult each other because it keeps us from the truth.  Be my keeper and let me be yours.  This study is Big News in Daveport and I won’t rest until it is Big News across the state. 

    I Challege you and anyone else who is interested to learn more about this study and why it is different than any other study to call the City of Davenport at 563-326-6165. Ask for the Affirmative Action Officer as I am sure he shares my resolve.

     

  • ialawyer

    Impact contracts Minority contractors are traditionally non union.  Large municipal contracts often have “Impact Agreements” requiring union labor.  These agreements equally benefit both local unions and the cities.

  • cna you spell pander?

    can you spell pander? The goal is to get blacks focused on their most troubling areas of concern, create proposals to study or fix the problems and submit written proposals to the commission. The commission will seek money from the Iowa Legislature to pay for the projects, he said.

    R U Kidding me?  What a bunch of silly blather.  What does this really mean in practical terms? It's just another money grab that will bear no fruit. How many studies?  How many proposals?  How many commissions on status?  How much more taxpayer money?  What is that magic bullet?

    Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are current barometers.  Just get up off the couch, get your high school diploma, don't commit crimes, don't do drugs, follow the rules, be polite.

    There's your study.  Save the money.  What a bunch of lazy asses trying to make it someone elses fault.

  • dellmar

    Response to Impact Contractors & Pander “Impact Contractors” I agree with many of his/her points… Yes, in most cases minority contractors are traditionally non union.  Hey, lets go a step further and talk about why?  Unions are the working man's friend… right?  If you know anything about our country history you will know that african americans have always had challenges breaking into unions.  Let me be the first to say that unions are not all the same.  There is a big difference from the teachers union and construction unions.  To the person who wrote “Impact Contractors” did you know that the Association of General Contractors (AGC “big union”) is against the Disparity Study in Davenport.  Why is that… because it is not business as usual.  It is the first step in shaking up the way the construction pie is cut.  This is the first study of this nature to be done in this state.  You ever wonder why the Kansas City, Chicago, Minnapolis, St. Louis cities of the world are doing what we should be doing in this state with regard to supporting diversity on public funded construction sites.  The answer is they have done this same study 10 to 15 years ago.  Let me also say that the US Supreme Court requires agencies wanting to pursue agressive affirmative action programs like maditory goals (that would require minorities to be hired and contracted with) to do this type of study. 

    To person who wrote “Impact Contractors” I disagree with one thing however…”Impact Agreements” do require union labor and I agree it is not fair, but do not for one moment accept that cities benefit from them.  You know as I know, that union labor comes with union rules and that means that guys and gals who are in one job category can not work in another even if that means they have to stand around and wait until someone else can pick the lumber and take it to their work area.  The stories go on… and maybe one could argue that non companies are not more cost efficient, but the fact is the way construction unions use rules on their work sites effect cost and these cost impact projects and in return effects the value of our taxpayers dollars used to fund these projects.  It is our fault (as citizens) if we let the union lobby out weight the importance and value of working class small business owners, taxpayer and citizens.

    It is easy to put all your frustration in one pot, but that is just not the way to change the world or at least change the way business in done around the state.  We have to fight for our politicans and political parties to break them away from taking money from the lobbies.  Honestly how can we expect our democratic party to hold construction unions accountable when many of their campaign contributions come from these same unions.  Should we go Republican… the problem still exist.  We need to focus on issue, we need to work with both parties and insure that our community is active in the issues rather than the party.

    To the person who wrote “Pandering” I find your comments the most troubling of all, because I know our community doesn't have a chance if we don't have you on board.  This work may seem like a bunch of silly blather, but let me share with you that there are men and women that have placed there lives and livelyhood on the promise that not only will the city come through with a fairshare of contracting oppertunity, but that finally the Iowa Department of Transportation will do the same.  That other larger cities in the state will do the same.  You want to know “What does this really mean in practical terms?”  It means that we can finally hurdle a barrier that was placed on our community's business people 20 years ago when we (as citizen) allowed affirmative action policies to be villianized and scaled back under the hood of reverse discrimination.  To the person who wrote “Pandering” can't you see… that is what they want, they pray on in-fighting and they hope that we insult each other because it keeps us from the truth.  Be my keeper and let me be yours.  This study is Big News in Daveport and I won't rest until it is Big News across the state. 

    I Challege you and anyone else who is interested to learn more about this study and why it is different than any other study to call the City of Davenport at 563-326-6165. Ask for the Affirmative Action Officer as I am sure he shares my resolve.

     

Switch to our mobile site