<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa official urges renewal of unemployment, COBRA benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/23098/iowa-official-urges-renewal-of-unemployment-cobra-benefits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/23098/iowa-official-urges-renewal-of-unemployment-cobra-benefits</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete_Murphy</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/23098/iowa-official-urges-renewal-of-unemployment-cobra-benefits/comment-page-1#comment-20818</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete_Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=23098#comment-20818</guid>
		<description>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#039;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#039; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated - nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs - tantamount to economic suicide.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit either of my web sites at &lt;a href=&quot;http://OpenWindowPublishingCo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenWindowPublishingCo.com&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; where you can read the preface, join in the blog discussion and, of course, buy the book if you like. (It&#039;s also available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://Amazon.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pete Murphy&lt;br&gt;Author, &quot;Five Short Blasts&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#39;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  </p>
<p>Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#39; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  </p>
<p>And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated &#8211; nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs &#8211; tantamount to economic suicide.  </p>
<p>Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!</p>
<p>If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit either of my web sites at <a href="http://OpenWindowPublishingCo.com" rel="nofollow">OpenWindowPublishingCo.com</a> or <a href="http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">PeteMurphy.wordpress.com</a> where you can read the preface, join in the blog discussion and, of course, buy the book if you like. (It&#39;s also available at <a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a>.)</p>
<p>Pete Murphy<br />Author, &#8220;Five Short Blasts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReformCobraNow</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/23098/iowa-official-urges-renewal-of-unemployment-cobra-benefits/comment-page-1#comment-20806</link>
		<dc:creator>ReformCobraNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=23098#comment-20806</guid>
		<description>Those who lost their jobs prior to the September 1, 2008 eligibility cut-off date never received any assistance with their COBRA premiums. Many if not most of those same people are not even eligible for COBRA now because their 18 months of coverage has expired. Even those who were lucky enough to receive the subsidy in the first place are starting to loose their coverage and are joining the estimated 50 million uninsured. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;According to a Harvard study, uninsured adults are 80% more likely to die from a traumatic injury than those who have insurance. Currently their are two bills working their way through congress that may offer some relief. For more information on these bills and other options to COBRA, please see our website at &lt;a href=&quot;http://cobrareform.weebly.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cobrareform.weebly.com/&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who lost their jobs prior to the September 1, 2008 eligibility cut-off date never received any assistance with their COBRA premiums. Many if not most of those same people are not even eligible for COBRA now because their 18 months of coverage has expired. Even those who were lucky enough to receive the subsidy in the first place are starting to loose their coverage and are joining the estimated 50 million uninsured. </p>
<p>According to a Harvard study, uninsured adults are 80% more likely to die from a traumatic injury than those who have insurance. Currently their are two bills working their way through congress that may offer some relief. For more information on these bills and other options to COBRA, please see our website at <a href="http://cobrareform.weebly.com/" rel="nofollow">http://cobrareform.weebly.com/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

