<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa Democratic State Convention: Conflict or Kumbaya?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-1#comment-11650</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-11650</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I doubt there were strings attached&lt;/strong&gt; My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I doubt there were strings attached</strong> My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).
<p>If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.</p>
<p>I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama. </p>
<p>Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegularJoe</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-1#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>RegularJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;One would hope...&lt;/strong&gt; ...a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That&#039;s not too much to ask, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One would hope&#8230;</strong> &#8230;a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That&#39;s not too much to ask, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-1#comment-11652</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-11652</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Clinton 4th District Deal&lt;/strong&gt; I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer. &lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Clinton 4th District Deal</strong> I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer.
<p>But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-1#comment-5455</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-5455</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Clinton 4th District Deal&lt;/strong&gt; I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer. &lt;p&gt;
But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Clinton 4th District Deal</strong> I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer.
<p>
But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegularJoe</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-#comment-5456</link>
		<dc:creator>RegularJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-5456</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;One would hope...&lt;/strong&gt; ...a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That&#039;s not too much to ask, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One would hope&#8230;</strong> &#8230;a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That&#8217;s not too much to ask, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya/comment-page-#comment-5457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2274/iowa-democratic-state-convention-conflict-or-kumbaya#comment-5457</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I doubt there were strings attached&lt;/strong&gt; My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).&lt;p&gt;
If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.&lt;p&gt;
I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama. &lt;p&gt;
Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I doubt there were strings attached</strong> My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).
<p>
If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.</p>
<p>
I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama. </p>
<p>
Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

