Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Iowa Democratic State Convention: Conflict or Kumbaya?

By John Deeth | 04.30.08 | 7:31 am

Iowa has been back in the presidential spotlight the last few days, with Saturday’s congressional district conventions and Barack Obama endorsements by superdelegates Richard Machacek and U.S. Rep. Bruce Braley. The state’s next moment in the spotlight, the June 14 state convention, could be one of the final major battles in the nomination fight between Obama and Hillary Clinton – or it could be Kumbaya time.

With the last primaries scheduled on June 3, and Clinton campaign chair Terry McAuliffe saying the nomination will wrap up by June 15, the state convention could see a fight-to-the-death battle for 11 national delegates. But if, say, Clinton leaves the race on something like June 13, the convention on June 15 could be the first opportunity for Democrats anywhere to begin the reuniting process.

State Convention, Des Moines, June 14
State Delegates 2500
VIABILITY 375
At Large National Delegates 10
  State Delegates National Delegates
Clinton 784 3
Edwards/Uncommitted 417 2
Obama 1299 5

As the math stands now, Obama would win five at-large national delegates, Clinton would gain three. John Edwards, viable on his own without help from another campaign, would get two. There is no scenario in which a candidate picks up only one delegate; the point of rounding up to one delegate is well below the 15 percent minimum for viability.

The state convention will also elected six pledged party leader and elected official delegates, which should break down as Obama 3, Clinton 2, and Edwards 1. There is also one add-on delegate, named by neutral state party chair Scott Brennan and ratified by the convention. The add-on delegate would need to be acceptable to the Obama campaign, since he controls more than 50 percent of the convention.

For Edwards to lose viability, he would have to lose 50 people at the state convention. The former candidate lost almost no one at last weekend’s congressional district conventions, except in the 4th District where he was not viable.

All this assumes that everyone shows up and that no one switches preference. That’s pretty close to what happened last weekend. All or nearly all of the 2,500 seats at the five districts were filled. There were small shifts to Edwards from Clinton in the 1st District and from Obama in the 5th District, to make or keep Edwards viable. He was on the bubble of viability in both places.

In the 4th District, where Edwards was well short of viable, a deal between Clinton and Edwards to make Edwards viable failed when Clinton supporters insisted that the Edwards national delegate be chosen from among the Clinton supporters who would have switched over. The Edwards group refused that deal, and most of them joined Obama. In the other four districts, the Edwards supporters stayed steadfast.

As for Iowa’s superdelegates, two remain up for grabs: party chair Scott Brennan and  Senator Tom Harkin. Harkin recommitted to staying neutral last weekend.

In addition to Machacek and Braley, Obama is backed by superdelegates Governor Chet Culver, Congressman Dave Loebsack, state treasurer Mike Fitzgerald, and state party vice chair Sarah Swisher. Clinton is supported by Congressman Leonard Boswell, state senate majority leader Mike Gronstal, and DNC member Sandy Opstvedt.

Comments

  • Tom

    Clinton 4th District Deal I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer.

    But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?

  • Tom

    Clinton 4th District Deal I had not heard the stipulation that the Edwards national delegate from the 4th District would have to have been someone from the Clinton preference group. If that is true, it was a pretty shallow offer.

    But is it true? There would have to be an election by the preference group, and Edwards delegates would far outnumber the Clinton delegates. What would prevent them from electing one of their own?

  • RegularJoe

    One would hope… …a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That's not too much to ask, is it?

  • Tom

    I doubt there were strings attached My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).

    If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.

    I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama.

    Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.

  • RegularJoe

    One would hope… …a bit of *integrity* on the part of all agreeing to the deal would prevent such a scenario. That’s not too much to ask, is it?

  • Tom

    I doubt there were strings attached My question was whether there really were any strings attached to the deal. As far as I know the Clinton delegation offered to give delegates to the Edwards group in order to make them viable (which would pull a national delegate spot from Obama). The Obama group made a different offer. The Edwards people rejected the Clinton offer and went as a group to Obama (in total, 42 Edwards/Uncommitted to Obama, 12 to Clinton).

    If the Edwards group accepted the offer and stayed viable, they could elect anyone they wanted to the national delegate spot. I am sure the Clinton people understood that, too.

    I think the real story here is that 1) the Edwards delegates were more interested in joining up with the Obama group than stay viable with the help of the Clinton delegates, and 2) that more than 3/4ths of the Edwards/Uncommitted people went to Obama.

    Bruce Braley and Richard Michacek seemed to show the same inclination, perhaps understanding the leaning of their fellow Edwards supporters and other constituents.

Switch to our mobile site