<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IFPC criticizes secular Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/19773/ifpc-criticizes-secular-republicans/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/19773/ifpc-criticizes-secular-republicans</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanPralle</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/19773/ifpc-criticizes-secular-republicans/comment-page-1#comment-24526</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanPralle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=19773#comment-24526</guid>
		<description>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#039;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people -- you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#039;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them -- heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &quot;religious conservative&quot; and the &quot;secular conservative&quot; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#39;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people &#8212; you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#39;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them &#8212; heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &#8220;religious conservative&#8221; and the &#8220;secular conservative&#8221; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanPralle</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/19773/ifpc-criticizes-secular-republicans/comment-page-1#comment-19586</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanPralle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=19773#comment-19586</guid>
		<description>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#039;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people -- you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#039;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them -- heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &quot;religious conservative&quot; and the &quot;secular conservative&quot; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#39;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people &#8212; you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#39;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them &#8212; heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &#8220;religious conservative&#8221; and the &#8220;secular conservative&#8221; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Pralle</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/19773/ifpc-criticizes-secular-republicans/comment-page-1#comment-18656</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Pralle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=19773#comment-18656</guid>
		<description>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#039;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people -- you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#039;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them -- heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &quot;religious conservative&quot; and the &quot;secular conservative&quot; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan English is an idiot and Gross had the exact right idea.   You don&#39;t have to give up your religious ideals, ethics, or morals to be a part of the GOP, but neither should you have to gain any or subscribe to them.   Leave religion out of it, people &#8212; you can have your conservative politics, restrained economics, limited social agenda without referring everyone to a local preacher for guidance.    It&#39;s a huge crutch to the GOP to have this stigma placed upon them &#8212; heck, I would happily subscribe to some of the conservative points but I would NEVER allow myself to be associated with the thickly-religious right and their exclusivisms.   The GOP is big enough to encompass both the &#8220;religious conservative&#8221; and the &#8220;secular conservative&#8221; if you all choose to ignore the entire issue and just concentrate on politics for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

