Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.
A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.
The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.
BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.
CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.
TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.
DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.
Videos: Richardson Challenges Dem Candidates on Iraq
Speaking at Cornell College in Mt. Vernon, Iowa, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson made a pitch for himself as a presidential candidate.
He challenged the other Democratic candidates on Iraq when he said: “They’ve decided to stop talking about Iraq. Their campaign strategies have shifted to other issues. Over the last few debates and on the campaign trail, our brave troops in Iraq seem to have been forgotten.”
Richardson did not ignore domestic issues in his speech. Among other concerns, he addressed unions and labor issues; health care; education and No Child Left Behind; and global warming and alternative energy issues.
He was asked by Cornell College student Bianca Byrd about leaving Iraq too soon. She said she was worried that Iraq would “implode” if we removed troops without a plan for protecting Iraqi people and stabilizing the region.
She was happy with his answer to her question. He said he wants to have “American diplomacy take over” after removing U.S. troops. He explained further that:
“Iraq is not exactly helpless. They have over 300,000 security forces; … they have a financial foundation for the future. … And then we can pay attention to what really concerns America, which is threats of international terrorism, nuclear terrorism, loose nuclear weapons, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, becoming energy independent, helping with international poverty and disease and having a foundation of having a foreign policy based on our human rights.”
More videos of Richardson’s speech are below the fold.Part of Richardson’s speech on the teleprompter
Here is more from Richardson on U.S. troops in Iraq:
Richardson was also asked about Iran and the vote on branding Iran’s Republican Guard as a terrorist organization.
He distanced himself from opponent Hillary Clinton, saying she was wrong to vote for the resolution, but he was quick to remind the audience of his work for former President Bill Clinton’s administration.
Here is Richardson on the foreign policy challenge of Iran and the rest of the middle East:
More on Richardson’s recent Iowa events from Iowa Independent reporters John Deeth and Tom Lindsey.
Richardson Goes After Clinton on Iraq Flip Flop Richardson has been consistent from Day 1 of the campaign that he would promptly pull ALL US forces out of Iraq. Clinton has refused to make any firm commitment to a time line on withdrawal.
What has Richardson gotten for being consistent, repeatedly raising the issue of the war during the campaign and showing the courage to tell it as it is on Iraq? He gets accused of pandering and being unrealistic (attacked by many in the MSM that thought invading Iraq was a great idea).
Here is his press release.
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA– New Mexico Governor and Democratic Presidential candidate Bill Richardson today issued the following statement on Senator Hillary Clinton’s drastic change to her position on the Iraq war:
“Senator Clinton’s statement that we could ‘certainly get all the troops out within a year‘ is a stunning flip-flop from what she has been saying all along. She consistently has called for leaving troops in Iraq to fight al-Qaida, train Iraqis, and protect U.S. assets. Has that suddenly been abandoned? If so, why has she changed her mind?
“In a September debate, she said that she could not commit to getting our troops out in five years, let alone in one year. Has anything changed about the logistics besides her position in the polls? It is clear that she is responding directly to my latest ad and my statements that she repeatedly has called for leaving thousands of troops in Iraq indefinitely. Rather than defending her position, apparently she simply has changed it.”
Since entering the race, Governor Richardson consistently has called for bringing all of our troops home from Iraq, a monumental diplomatic effort to reach a political reconciliation that could be enforced by a multinational peacekeeping force, and a donor conference to infuse the capital necessary to rebuild Iraq.
Recent statements on Iraq by Senator Clinton:
*
“Clinton: U.S. troops needed in Iraq beyond 2009″ http://www.cnn.com/2… March 15, 2007.
“If elected president, Sen. Hillary Clinton said, she would likely keep some U.S. forces in Iraq in a supporting role after 2009 because America has “a remaining military as well as a political mission” that requires a presence there.”
* “A Duty to Mislead: Politics and the Iraq War.” By Ted Koppel. All Things Considered. June 11, 2007. http://www.npr.org/t…
“But I ran into an old source the other day who held a senior position at the Pentagon until his retirement. He occasionally briefs Senator Clinton on the situation in the Gulf. She told him that if she were elected president and then reelected four years later, she would still expect U.S. troops to be in Iraq at the end of her second term.”
* “Democratic Field Says Leaving Iraq May Take Years.” By Jeff Zeleny and Marc Santora. The New York Times. 12 August 2007.
“Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York would leave residual forces to fight terrorism and to stabilize the Kurdish region in the north
Stephen Cassidy
Richardson Goes After Clinton on Iraq Flip Flop Richardson has been consistent from Day 1 of the campaign that he would promptly pull ALL US forces out of Iraq. Clinton has refused to make any firm commitment to a time line on withdrawal.
What has Richardson gotten for being consistent, repeatedly raising the issue of the war during the campaign and showing the courage to tell it as it is on Iraq? He gets accused of pandering and being unrealistic (attacked by many in the MSM that thought invading Iraq was a great idea).
Here is his press release.
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA– New Mexico Governor and Democratic Presidential candidate Bill Richardson today issued the following statement on Senator Hillary Clinton's drastic change to her position on the Iraq war:
“Senator Clinton's statement that we could 'certainly get all the troops out within a year' is a stunning flip-flop from what she has been saying all along. She consistently has called for leaving troops in Iraq to fight al-Qaida, train Iraqis, and protect U.S. assets. Has that suddenly been abandoned? If so, why has she changed her mind?
“In a September debate, she said that she could not commit to getting our troops out in five years, let alone in one year. Has anything changed about the logistics besides her position in the polls? It is clear that she is responding directly to my latest ad and my statements that she repeatedly has called for leaving thousands of troops in Iraq indefinitely. Rather than defending her position, apparently she simply has changed it.”
Since entering the race, Governor Richardson consistently has called for bringing all of our troops home from Iraq, a monumental diplomatic effort to reach a political reconciliation that could be enforced by a multinational peacekeeping force, and a donor conference to infuse the capital necessary to rebuild Iraq.
Recent statements on Iraq by Senator Clinton:
*
“Clinton: U.S. troops needed in Iraq beyond 2009″ http://www.cnn.com/2… March 15, 2007.
“If elected president, Sen. Hillary Clinton said, she would likely keep some U.S. forces in Iraq in a supporting role after 2009 because America has “a remaining military as well as a political mission” that requires a presence there.”
* “A Duty to Mislead: Politics and the Iraq War.” By Ted Koppel. All Things Considered. June 11, 2007. http://www.npr.org/t…
“But I ran into an old source the other day who held a senior position at the Pentagon until his retirement. He occasionally briefs Senator Clinton on the situation in the Gulf. She told him that if she were elected president and then reelected four years later, she would still expect U.S. troops to be in Iraq at the end of her second term.”
* “Democratic Field Says Leaving Iraq May Take Years.” By Jeff Zeleny and Marc Santora. The New York Times. 12 August 2007.
“Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York would leave residual forces to fight terrorism and to stabilize the Kurdish region in the north