Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Richardson: I Need Top Three in First Three

By John Deeth | 12.17.07 | 10:26 am

Bill Richardson is the latest in a series of five Democratic candidates to address the Iowa City Foreign Relations council.  After his speech, Richardson told Iowa Independent, “I need to be in the top three in each of those three” first states — Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.  Below the fold, John Deeth’s first take liveblog impressions.10:18 a.m. and greetings from downtown Iowa City.  About 75 in the room for Bill Richardson (Nick Johnson says 100, close anyway.)

This is Richardson’s first solo Iowa City trip in a while.  He was on campus last night, so this midday crowd at the Iowa City library skews a little older.  This is the same room Edwards was in Wednesday, and he had 250 to 300 packed in.

Jeanette Carter of Iowa City is a Bill backer.  “He’s remained civil throughout the campaign, which points to his skill as a diplomat and a mediator.”  She also says he’d be the best to get us out of the war and has the most experience.

10:30  and he’s here.  Moderator notes that six candidates from each party were invited, and no Republicans have responded.  (After the event Tom Baldridge of the UI tells me Biden, Dodd, Edwards and Obama have done events.  So that’s 5 of 6 on the Dem side)  The format is written Q and A.


Local supporter Dorothy Paul is handling the intro proper.  Crowd looks like it’s up to 120 or so.  Says other candidates have offered “deafening silence” on nuke proliferation.

“My plan on Iraq is simple: withdraw our forces in one year.”  Says he’s the only candidate who’ll leave no residual forces or contractors behind.  “Our troops have done a magnificent job.  But when 70% of Iraqis say it’s OK to shot at American troops, that mission is unsustainable.”

He’d keep some troops in Kuwait, send additional forces to Afghanistan, but would spend bulk of the $ on domestic programs.  In the year of withdrawal, he says he has a three point plan.

1. American led effort at political compromise along lines of Dayton accords involving land, power, and shared cabinet ministries and oil $.

2. US led UN effort to create UN peacekeeping force, most likely Arab and European countries.

3. US led donor conference for Iraqi reconstruction.

“Iraq is not exactly helpless.”  I’d invite Syria and Iran to discuss region, tie Israel/Palestine into region security mix.  “What unifies everybody together is not wanting an explosion in Iraq that would cause a humanitarian crisis.”  Region needs stability.

There’s a political solution, but no military solution.   “There’s no progress toward political compromise, or sharing of oil revenue.”  Cites generals saying surge is a misadventure.

“America today s faces with transnational challenges in an interdependent world, and we have taken our eye off the ball too long.”  Global warming, nuke proliferation, refugee crisis, AIDS, tribal and ethnic warfare, Iran and North Korea.  And a real effort to deal with Israel/Palestine.

“My foreign policy would be reflected in American ideals.  Equality, and freedom, and respect for human rights.  America needs to leave, not follow.”
“Why is it that there are six wars going on in Africa right now and nobody cares?”

Calls for a “21st century Marshall Plan” to eliminate global poverty.  Work with third world micro-loans, shift from loans to grants.  Focus aid to human need, not propping up dictators.

US should take lead on global warming.  Kyoto treaty?  “I’d sign it, scrap it, and make it even petter.”  30% greenhouse gas reduction by 202 with a cap and trade system. Massive shift to alternative fuels, and get vehicles to 50 MPG.  (Lots of specific energy stats flying by quickly…)

“I will ask each one of you to sacrifice in the name of renewable energy.”  More than just wearing sweaters…

US Needs to get more engaged with the UN (notes his ambassadorship).  Wants a permanent peacekeeping force.  It takes 7-8 months to assemble which is too long in a crisis like Darfur.  Would expand UN Security Council.  Add Germany and Japan, one African, Asian and Latin American country.  India, Nigeria, South Africa, maybe Brazil or Mexico.

“It’s time America cared about issues like genocide and sexual slavery, and cross-border crime like narcotics.”

Global disease: need a US led world effort to deal with generic drugs and education.

“What kind of nation do we want to be?”  Go back to the past.  “I will follow the constitution.  I will not go to war without the consent of Congress.”  “Torture in any form is unacceptable.”  Generals oppose: it doesn’t work and it puts our troops at risk.

“In a Bil Richardson presidency, we will not be the world’s policeman, but we will try to be the world’s conscience”

He’s staying more formal than the last time I saw him solo, in this same room.  He’s staying behind the podium and not wandering.  Main speech wraps at 10:56.

Res Honey asks first question: restoring the world’s good will to America.  BR: “It’s called diplomacy, it’s called negotiation.”  Cites Rabin saying you don’t make peace with your friends, you make peace with your enemies.  First day I’ll close Gitmo (first applause) Restore rule of law and balance of power, and rejoin the international community.

“We’re gonna resolve this Cuba issue, this embargo doesn’t work.”  Drops the idea of Alliance For Progress 2.

Question: Strengthening non-UN international organizations.  BR: I’d appoint experts, not political hacks, to international bodies.  “All these institutions are Cold War institutions, and they do good work, but there are changes in the world.”  I’d shift emphasis.  Repeats third world grants not loans.  Cites Bono’s popularity in the third world, but mispronounces his name and says it like Sonny Bono.  US needs to devote 1% of budget to international poverty assistance.  Re-cites UN security council additions.

Role of education in foreign policy.  BR says domestic curricula need to be updated in geography, foreign language, civics. Says State Sen. Daryl Beall told him Iowans have the highest per capita rate of passports, which reflects interest in the world: “and I believe it with the questions you ask.”  Revise and modernize stuff like Radio Free Europe toward the Islamic world and use the internet, instead of radio beamed to Cuba.  Get the Islamic world to close down hate schools.

Now taking the question to national service: two years of college tuition for one year of national service (civilian or military.  “I sense that Americans want to do things for the common good.”

China question.  BR: I want to find a way to get along with major powers. China is a strategic competitor, but we have to live together.  ” don’t like their commitment to human rights — because it doesn’t exist that much.”  They don’t use their leverage in Burma, Darfur, etc.  Need to be tougher on trade with China.  They manipulate currency.  “You have to gauge the relationship, so they don’t get too mad.  But they need the American market.”  Shut down the defective toys.  Goes on a tangent with a wife story.  Apparently she’s concerned about cat food from China.  They’re Jake and Squeaky by the way, and they rule the NM governor’s mansion.

Characteristics of leading foreign policy issues.  Jokes about he and Biden asking each other to be Sec of State.  “I would let you know my cabinet before the election.”  Says cabinet would “look like America.”  (Bill Clinton said that verbatim in 1992).  Will pick a teacher as Sec of Ed, a vet to head VA, a family farmer to head Ag, a union member as Sec of Labor.  (I think he’s used that riff before but I haven’t heard it.)

Winding down at 11:15.

Rex Honey says everyone should learn Spanish, gets applause.  Jokes that Bill should say “everyone should learn Spanish AND a foreign language.”  Richardson jokes he’s “not a morning person,” but 11:19 is barely considered morning on Iowa time.

Richardson give me ad a Daily Iowa reporter a little press time.  He says his Iraq plan is still feasible.  “I have military experts who support it — we CAN get our troops out in a year with a strong diplomatic plan.”  He contrasts his plan with Biden’s.  “The plans of a partition need to be looked at, but partition hasn’t worked before.  It didn’t work in India, it hasn’t worked in other places.”

As for the horse race, Richardson says he can turn Iowa around with hard work, grass roots, and a strong organization.  “Iowans are independent, and they like an underdog,” he says, as an actual dog, a service dog, sniffs at our feet as if on cue.  We all chuckle then Richardson gets back on track. “50 percent of caucus goers haven’t made up their minds.”  I note that one of his supporters gave him credit for bing positive.  “I don’t like to get negative, but I will point out differences,” he says.  “We try to keep it civil and not engage in anything personal.  I’m the most positive candidate in the race and I think this country is a positive country, and I’ve got solutions.”

So, how important is Iowa? “Huuuuuuuuge.”  Says he’s putting a big emphasis on Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.Then he sets the bar: “I need to be in the top three in each of those three.”  But he won’t nibble on “what if you’re not.”  “I’m fourth and moving up in Iowa, we’re already third in New Hampshire.”

The staffers pull him away, but not before he can say “Hey, I like your hat.  What is that?”

“It’s a raspberry beret.”

A brief scare that I’m going to have to run three blocks to the Hamburg Inn, but that’s not the candidate, just the local staffers celebrating the event.  They do broadly hint that Richardson will be back in Iowa City post-holiday.

Comments

  • jayjanson

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported” HistoryNewsNetwork Keep thinking that the American public would respond with increased generosity if it was aware of its citizen complicity in the early CIA fostering of rebelious war in Southern Sudan after oil was discoved there. (my article IS on the ‘Operation Sudan of SaveDafur” web site)

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported” HistoryNewsNetwork

      I once worked on a documentary for an anniversary of the African Development Bank and although never was in Darfur, I was close enough to the Sudan border in Ethiopian and Kenya and have a spot in my heart for the magnificent people of this region. I just knocked out this article when I  remembered, (I’m well into my 70s) of U.S. backing the rebels was never being factored in.
    By the way, I wonder and ask you as someone more conversant on the Sudan than I, whether or not the U.S. is still actively supporting the rebellion{s}, either materially or diplomatically, either openly or secretly. sentimentally, morally and/or spiritually.?
    Appreciativly in advance should you have time to read my article below and comment,
    Jay Janson

    While there is great sorrow and indignation over the suffering and loss of life in the Sudan, early U.S. involvement in the war goes unmentioned. Instead, the U.S. leads an effort to condemn China for buying Sudan’s oil. For years the U.S. had paid for war in hopes to arrange for some eventual control of the oil discovered in Darfur, (all well once well reported in the New York Times). The human crises receives modest financial aid from a U.S. government, silently protected from any embarrassment of acknowledging a prime complicity in fomenting war in Darfur.

    HistoryNewNetwork, George Mason University republished the folloing from:
    http://www.opednews….

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported”

    http://hnn.us/roundu… HNN Darfur

    republished as well by Global Research, Operation Sudan of SaveDafur, UK IndyMedia,  Ethiopian News, FreeThoughtManifesto, Islamic Forum, Countercurrents, Nicholas D. Kristof, Schema-Root news, jcturner23′s reviews, NewsTrust,News Search Tracker, alfatomega, Newsvine, Digg, Netscape, Boreal Access, Newswire, Tailrank, Congo Music News, Zaire, mideastyouth.com, Darfur News from Google, ibrattleboro.com and sundry other sites from the original in OpEdNews, January 23, 2007

    http://www.opednews….

    There has been a glaring omission in the U.S. media presentation of the Darfur tragedy. The compassion demonstrated, mostly in words, until recently, has not been accompanied by a recognition of U.S. complicity, or at least involvement, in the war which has led to the enormous suffering and loss of life that has been taking place in Darfur for many years.

    In 1978 oil was discovered in Southern Sudan. Rebellious war began five years later and was led by John Garang, who had taken military training at infamous Fort Benning, Georgia. “The US government decided, in 1996, to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the ‘front-line’ states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime.” [Federation of American Scientists fas.org]

    Between 1983 and the peace agreement signed in January 2005, Sudan’s civil war took nearly two million lives and left millions more displaced. Garang became a First Vice President of Sudan as part of the peace agreement in 2005. From 1983, “war and famine-related effects resulted in more than 4 million people displaced and, according to rebel estimates, more than 2 million deaths over a period of two decades.”
    [CIA Fact Book -entry Sudan]

    The BBC obituary of John Garang, who died in a plane crash shortly afterward, describes him as having “varied from Marxism to drawing support from Christian fundamentalists in the US.” “There was always confusion on central issues such as whether the Sudan People’s Liberation Army was fighting for independence for southern Sudan or merely more autonomy. Friends and foes alike found the SPLA’s human rights record in southern Sudan and Mr Garang’s style of governance disturbing.” Gill Lusk – deputy editor of Africa Confidential and a Sudan specialist who interviewed the ex-guerrilla leader several times over the years was quoted by BBC, “John Garang did not tolerate dissent and anyone who disagreed with him was either imprisoned or killed.”

    CIA use of tough guys like Garang in Sudan, Savimbi in Angola, Mobutu in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo), had been reported, even in mass media, though certainly not featured or criticized, but presently, this is of course buried away from public awareness and meant to be forgotten, as commercial media focuses on presenting the U.S. wars of today in a heroic light. It has traditionally been the chore of progressive, alternate and independent journalism to see that their deathly deeds supported by U.S. citizens tax dollars are not forgotten, ultimately not accepted and past Congresses and Presidents held responsible, even in retrospect, when not in real time.

    Oil and business interests remain paramount and although Sudan is on the U.S. Government’s state sponsors of terrorism list, the United States alternately praises its cooperation in tracking suspect individuals or scolds about the Janjaweed in Darfur. National Public Radio on May 2, 2005 had Los Angeles Times writer Ken Silverstein talk about his article “highlighting strong ties between the U.S. and Sudanese intelligence services, despite the Bush administration’s criticism of human-rights violation in the Sudan.” Title was “Sudan, CIA Forge Close Ties, Despite Rights Abuses.” Nicholas Kristof, of The New York Times, won a 2006 Pulitzer Prize for “his having alerted this nation and the world to these massive crimes against humanity. He made six dangerous trips to Darfur to report names and faces of victims of the genocide for which President Bush had long before indicted the government of Sudan to the world’s indifference.” [Reuters] But last November saw the opening of a new U.S. consulate in Juba the capital of the Southern region. (Maybe consider this an example of “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em!” especially where oil is involved.)

    The point is there is human suffering at mammoth level proportions. Humanitarian activists are trying to pry open the purse strings of an administration and congress willing to spend billions upon billions to get people killed and keep them in their place, namely, at our feet. Reminding Congress of what needs to be atoned for because of past policies of supporting war and human destruction could eventually make present policies of war intolerable. Americans are presently not exactly conscious stricken about dead and maimed Iraqis and Afghans, for commercial media always keeps of most of the human particulars of war crimes modestly out of sight, dramatizing much lesser losses and suffering of American military personal abroad.

    Darfur made the headlines again because a governor of presidential timber was building up his foreign policy credentials. Meanwhile we are going to continue to see newsreels of our mass media depressing us with scenes of starving children, basically as testimony of how evil another Islamic nation’s government is, so we can feel good – and want to purchase the products needing the advertising – which pays for the entertainment/news programs – which keep viewers in the dark about THEIR contribution to the suffering brought upon those people all the way over there in Africa.

    Just try to put 4 and 2 million of anything into perspective. We are talking about an equivalent to the sets of eyes of half the population of Manhattan. Imagine one of us, whether a precious child ,a handsome man, a beautiful women, – to the tune of, (dirge of), one times four million, half of us dead. Sorry! It has no impact right? We realize that, remembering the words of Joseph Stalin (of all people), “One man’s death is a tragedy, a thousand, is a statistic.” There is absolutely no way we can whip up enough anguish to match a total of four million displaced and two million dead Sudanese, unless we could be of a mind and heart with Martin Luther King dealing with three million dead Vietnamese, also as in this case, over on the other side of the world, far from our living rooms – “So it is that those of us who are yet determined that “America will be” are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.” (MLK, 1967, “Beyond Vietnam”)

    This writer remembers reading newspapers articles about the U.S. backing the Southern Sudan rebellion way back then. If we had supported a side that wound up winning, we would be bragging about our having supported ‘freedom fighters’. But we just threw a lot of money and outdated weapons at a John Garang in the Sudan, as we did with Jonas Savimbi in Angola, to the ultimate destruction of millions of people, and they LOST! Like we did in Vietnam, and half-way lost in Korea, and now are mid-way losing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Jesus! Calculating the chances of an investment in human life and money coming to a fruition of sorts – that is certainly the job of any intelligence gathering agency! What we have had is an Agency using its gathered intelligence to do unintelligent things because, as our Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote more than a hundred and twenty-five years ago, “Things are in the saddle and ride herd over men” (trampling others under foot, we might add)

    The European Union is under pressure from inside to assure that a United Nations force of 20,000 men will be sent to Darfur as required by Security Council resolution 1706, and to threaten sanctions in order to halt a war the U.S. was originally interested to see begun.

    The U.N. Security Council will receive a list from the International Criminal Court of those Sudanese officials who could be charged with war crimes. The list is expected include some members of rebel organizations among Sudanese government officials and Janjaweed militias. There assuredly will be no names on the list of non-Sudanese officials of nations which were known to have involved themselves in this Sudanese civil war contrary to accepted provisions and obligations of U.N. membership. But we can know that the responsibility for war, slaughter, rape and theft in Sudan extends beyond the leaders of those murderously wielding guns and swords.

    It will be good if outside influence will now be focused on peace, but citizens best be vigilant of their nation’s foreign policy intentions. The world has heard many protestations that oil is not a reason for war, but blood and oil has been known to mix.
    ————————– end of article——————-

    That now the U.S. use its economic power humanely, to promote peace in the Sudan and give generously to help war victims.

    in brotherhood,
    Jay Janson

    P.S.————————
    Published on 5 Jul 2004 by Zaman Daily. Archived on 5 Jul 2004.
    Oil Underlies Darfur Tragedy
    by Cumali Onal

    The fighting in Sudan’s Darfur region, which is being reported in the world press as ‘ethnic cleansing’ and a ‘humanitarian crisis’, reportedly stems from attempts to gain control over the oil resources in the region, claim Arab sources.

    These Arab sources find it interesting that such skirmishes occurred when a peace agreement that would have brought an end to 21 years of north-south conflict was about to be signed. The sources point out that oil fields have recently been discovered in Darfur.

  • Anonymous

    I thought Biden did one of these too (You have Edwards and Dodd).

  • desmoinesdem

    thanks for the live-blog I have heard Bill Richardson say that stuff about who would be in his cabinet, both in person and at one of the debates or forums earlier this year.

  • Anonymous

    I thought Biden did one of these too (You have Edwards and Dodd).

  • Anonymous

    Dems 5 of 6 AFter the speech I got the deal: Five of top six Dems (all except Clinton)

  • desmoinesdem

    thanks for the live-blog I have heard Bill Richardson say that stuff about who would be in his cabinet, both in person and at one of the debates or forums earlier this year.

  • jayjanson

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported” HistoryNewsNetwork Keep thinking that the American public would respond with increased generosity if it was aware of its citizen complicity in the early CIA fostering of rebelious war in Southern Sudan after oil was discoved there. (my article IS on the 'Operation Sudan of SaveDafur” web site)

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported” HistoryNewsNetwork

      I once worked on a documentary for an anniversary of the African Development Bank and although never was in Darfur, I was close enough to the Sudan border in Ethiopian and Kenya and have a spot in my heart for the magnificent people of this region. I just knocked out this article when I  remembered, (I'm well into my 70s) of U.S. backing the rebels was never being factored in.

    By the way, I wonder and ask you as someone more conversant on the Sudan than I, whether or not the U.S. is still actively supporting the rebellion{s}, either materially or diplomatically, either openly or secretly. sentimentally, morally and/or spiritually.?

    Appreciativly in advance should you have time to read my article below and comment,

    Jay Janson

    While there is great sorrow and indignation over the suffering and loss of life in the Sudan, early U.S. involvement in the war goes unmentioned. Instead, the U.S. leads an effort to condemn China for buying Sudan's oil. For years the U.S. had paid for war in hopes to arrange for some eventual control of the oil discovered in Darfur, (all well once well reported in the New York Times). The human crises receives modest financial aid from a U.S. government, silently protected from any embarrassment of acknowledging a prime complicity in fomenting war in Darfur.

    HistoryNewNetwork, George Mason University republished the folloing from:

    http://www.opednews….

    “Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported”

    http://hnn.us/roundu… HNN Darfur

    republished as well by Global Research, Operation Sudan of SaveDafur, UK IndyMedia,  Ethiopian News, FreeThoughtManifesto, Islamic Forum, Countercurrents, Nicholas D. Kristof, Schema-Root news, jcturner23's reviews, NewsTrust,News Search Tracker, alfatomega, Newsvine, Digg, Netscape, Boreal Access, Newswire, Tailrank, Congo Music News, Zaire, mideastyouth.com, Darfur News from Google, ibrattleboro.com and sundry other sites from the original in OpEdNews, January 23, 2007

    http://www.opednews….

    There has been a glaring omission in the U.S. media presentation of the Darfur tragedy. The compassion demonstrated, mostly in words, until recently, has not been accompanied by a recognition of U.S. complicity, or at least involvement, in the war which has led to the enormous suffering and loss of life that has been taking place in Darfur for many years.

    In 1978 oil was discovered in Southern Sudan. Rebellious war began five years later and was led by John Garang, who had taken military training at infamous Fort Benning, Georgia. “The US government decided, in 1996, to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the 'front-line' states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime.” [Federation of American Scientists fas.org]

    Between 1983 and the peace agreement signed in January 2005, Sudan's civil war took nearly two million lives and left millions more displaced. Garang became a First Vice President of Sudan as part of the peace agreement in 2005. From 1983, “war and famine-related effects resulted in more than 4 million people displaced and, according to rebel estimates, more than 2 million deaths over a period of two decades.”

    [CIA Fact Book -entry Sudan]

    The BBC obituary of John Garang, who died in a plane crash shortly afterward, describes him as having “varied from Marxism to drawing support from Christian fundamentalists in the US.” “There was always confusion on central issues such as whether the Sudan People's Liberation Army was fighting for independence for southern Sudan or merely more autonomy. Friends and foes alike found the SPLA's human rights record in southern Sudan and Mr Garang's style of governance disturbing.” Gill Lusk – deputy editor of Africa Confidential and a Sudan specialist who interviewed the ex-guerrilla leader several times over the years was quoted by BBC, “John Garang did not tolerate dissent and anyone who disagreed with him was either imprisoned or killed.”

    CIA use of tough guys like Garang in Sudan, Savimbi in Angola, Mobutu in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo), had been reported, even in mass media, though certainly not featured or criticized, but presently, this is of course buried away from public awareness and meant to be forgotten, as commercial media focuses on presenting the U.S. wars of today in a heroic light. It has traditionally been the chore of progressive, alternate and independent journalism to see that their deathly deeds supported by U.S. citizens tax dollars are not forgotten, ultimately not accepted and past Congresses and Presidents held responsible, even in retrospect, when not in real time.

    Oil and business interests remain paramount and although Sudan is on the U.S. Government's state sponsors of terrorism list, the United States alternately praises its cooperation in tracking suspect individuals or scolds about the Janjaweed in Darfur. National Public Radio on May 2, 2005 had Los Angeles Times writer Ken Silverstein talk about his article “highlighting strong ties between the U.S. and Sudanese intelligence services, despite the Bush administration's criticism of human-rights violation in the Sudan.” Title was “Sudan, CIA Forge Close Ties, Despite Rights Abuses.” Nicholas Kristof, of The New York Times, won a 2006 Pulitzer Prize for “his having alerted this nation and the world to these massive crimes against humanity. He made six dangerous trips to Darfur to report names and faces of victims of the genocide for which President Bush had long before indicted the government of Sudan to the world's indifference.” [Reuters] But last November saw the opening of a new U.S. consulate in Juba the capital of the Southern region. (Maybe consider this an example of “If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!” especially where oil is involved.)

    The point is there is human suffering at mammoth level proportions. Humanitarian activists are trying to pry open the purse strings of an administration and congress willing to spend billions upon billions to get people killed and keep them in their place, namely, at our feet. Reminding Congress of what needs to be atoned for because of past policies of supporting war and human destruction could eventually make present policies of war intolerable. Americans are presently not exactly conscious stricken about dead and maimed Iraqis and Afghans, for commercial media always keeps of most of the human particulars of war crimes modestly out of sight, dramatizing much lesser losses and suffering of American military personal abroad.

    Darfur made the headlines again because a governor of presidential timber was building up his foreign policy credentials. Meanwhile we are going to continue to see newsreels of our mass media depressing us with scenes of starving children, basically as testimony of how evil another Islamic nation's government is, so we can feel good – and want to purchase the products needing the advertising – which pays for the entertainment/news programs – which keep viewers in the dark about THEIR contribution to the suffering brought upon those people all the way over there in Africa.

    Just try to put 4 and 2 million of anything into perspective. We are talking about an equivalent to the sets of eyes of half the population of Manhattan. Imagine one of us, whether a precious child ,a handsome man, a beautiful women, – to the tune of, (dirge of), one times four million, half of us dead. Sorry! It has no impact right? We realize that, remembering the words of Joseph Stalin (of all people), “One man's death is a tragedy, a thousand, is a statistic.” There is absolutely no way we can whip up enough anguish to match a total of four million displaced and two million dead Sudanese, unless we could be of a mind and heart with Martin Luther King dealing with three million dead Vietnamese, also as in this case, over on the other side of the world, far from our living rooms – “So it is that those of us who are yet determined that “America will be” are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.” (MLK, 1967, “Beyond Vietnam”)

    This writer remembers reading newspapers articles about the U.S. backing the Southern Sudan rebellion way back then. If we had supported a side that wound up winning, we would be bragging about our having supported 'freedom fighters'. But we just threw a lot of money and outdated weapons at a John Garang in the Sudan, as we did with Jonas Savimbi in Angola, to the ultimate destruction of millions of people, and they LOST! Like we did in Vietnam, and half-way lost in Korea, and now are mid-way losing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Jesus! Calculating the chances of an investment in human life and money coming to a fruition of sorts – that is certainly the job of any intelligence gathering agency! What we have had is an Agency using its gathered intelligence to do unintelligent things because, as our Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote more than a hundred and twenty-five years ago, “Things are in the saddle and ride herd over men” (trampling others under foot, we might add)

    The European Union is under pressure from inside to assure that a United Nations force of 20,000 men will be sent to Darfur as required by Security Council resolution 1706, and to threaten sanctions in order to halt a war the U.S. was originally interested to see begun.

    The U.N. Security Council will receive a list from the International Criminal Court of those Sudanese officials who could be charged with war crimes. The list is expected include some members of rebel organizations among Sudanese government officials and Janjaweed militias. There assuredly will be no names on the list of non-Sudanese officials of nations which were known to have involved themselves in this Sudanese civil war contrary to accepted provisions and obligations of U.N. membership. But we can know that the responsibility for war, slaughter, rape and theft in Sudan extends beyond the leaders of those murderously wielding guns and swords.

    It will be good if outside influence will now be focused on peace, but citizens best be vigilant of their nation's foreign policy intentions. The world has heard many protestations that oil is not a reason for war, but blood and oil has been known to mix.

    ————————– end of article——————-

    That now the U.S. use its economic power humanely, to promote peace in the Sudan and give generously to help war victims.

    in brotherhood,

    Jay Janson

    P.S.————————

    Published on 5 Jul 2004 by Zaman Daily. Archived on 5 Jul 2004.

    Oil Underlies Darfur Tragedy

    by Cumali Onal

    The fighting in Sudan's Darfur region, which is being reported in the world press as 'ethnic cleansing' and a 'humanitarian crisis', reportedly stems from attempts to gain control over the oil resources in the region, claim Arab sources.

    These Arab sources find it interesting that such skirmishes occurred when a peace agreement that would have brought an end to 21 years of north-south conflict was about to be signed. The sources point out that oil fields have recently been discovered in Darfur.

  • Anonymous

    Dems 5 of 6 AFter the speech I got the deal: Five of top six Dems (all except Clinton)

Categories & Tags: |

Switch to our mobile site