Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

‘Cash for clunkers’ bill passed by House

By Jason Hancock | 06.10.09 | 10:15 am

A bill allowing consumers to trade in gas-guzzling automobiles for a $4,500 voucher for more fuel-efficient vehicles passed the U.S. House Tuesday.

Co-sponsored by Iowa Democratic Rep. Bruce Braley, the “cash for clunkers” legislation is designed to boost car sales during a bleak period for the auto industry. It also aims to reduce the amount of cars on the nation’s roads with poor fuel efficiency.

Car owners could get a voucher worth $3,500 if they traded in a vehicle getting 18 miles per gallon or less for one getting at least 22 miles per gallon. The value of the voucher would grow to $4,500 if the mileage of the new car were 10 mpg higher than the old vehicle. The House approved the bill 298-119.

“The passage of Cash for Clunkers legislation will help boost our economy, save families money, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” Braley said in a statement. “Cash for Clunkers is a common-sense idea that can have a big impact on the economy, reducing emissions and saving American jobs by jumpstarting the auto industry.  I hope the passage of this bill today is a sign that this program will start benefiting families and American workers as soon as possible.”

Discussing the bill with the Iowa Independent earlier this year, Braley pointed to Germany, which passed a similar incentive and saw its auto sales jump 20 percent.  (While no one disputes that the bill would be a boost to the ailing automobile industry, it is debatable whether it will be a net positive or negative for the environment.)

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • no8to5forme

    WHY MUST I PAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE'S NEW CAR???

    My “CLUNKER” is 18 years old and gets 27 mpg — better than most new cars available. Since I have been unemployed for 20 months, I CAN'T AFFORD to keep paying for all this!

    I don't want to own GM or Chrysler. I don't want to have the Government pay for my healthcare. I don't want to kiss Iran's @$$.

    What I DO want is a “government: of the people, by the people, for the people” – is that too much to ask???

    • Gadaki

      Apparently it is too much to ask….I'm starting to like the idea years ago of voting in new people just on the general principle that they haven't done as much to us as the ones already in there….maybe it'd take them longer to start making stupid bills…

  • Gadaki

    Ok, so we, the American people, have to pay people to trade in their cars????? Just because the auto industry is slow? Is this what we are paying our representatives to do to us???

  • cybertiger844

    I agree that this bill is a foolish step in trying to restore the economy. How many people can even afford to buy a new car now, regardless the “incentive?” I fail to see how this is going to do anything but damage the economy. As a hot rodder, I rely on the older cars that are out there to get parts from, to use as foundations for restoration. Aftermarket suppliers and restoration shops are going to be hurt by having fewer of these cars available. I understand the effort, but at the same time, I can name literally hundreds of guys and gals who have rebuilt their cars to not only look and perform better than stock, but also have increased their effective gas range as well. Isn't it a bit hypocritical for the government to give incentives for buying cars that get good gas mileage, while also having a “gas guzzler tax” on the books? It seems true that if you have enough money, the rules don't apply to you.

  • cybertiger844

    I agree that this bill is a foolish step in trying to restore the economy. How many people can even afford to buy a new car now, regardless the “incentive?” I fail to see how this is going to do anything but damage the economy. As a hot rodder, I rely on the older cars that are out there to get parts from, to use as foundations for restoration. Aftermarket suppliers and restoration shops are going to be hurt by having fewer of these cars available. I understand the effort, but at the same time, I can name literally hundreds of guys and gals who have rebuilt their cars to not only look and perform better than stock, but also have increased their effective gas range as well. Isn't it a bit hypocritical for the government to give incentives for buying cars that get good gas mileage, while also having a “gas guzzler tax” on the books? It seems true that if you have enough money, the rules don't apply to you.

  • cybertiger844

    I agree that this bill is a foolish step in trying to restore the economy. How many people can even afford to buy a new car now, regardless the “incentive?” I fail to see how this is going to do anything but damage the economy. As a hot rodder, I rely on the older cars that are out there to get parts from, to use as foundations for restoration. Aftermarket suppliers and restoration shops are going to be hurt by having fewer of these cars available. I understand the effort, but at the same time, I can name literally hundreds of guys and gals who have rebuilt their cars to not only look and perform better than stock, but also have increased their effective gas range as well. Isn't it a bit hypocritical for the government to give incentives for buying cars that get good gas mileage, while also having a “gas guzzler tax” on the books? It seems true that if you have enough money, the rules don't apply to you.

Switch to our mobile site