<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU of Iowa supports gay marriage opponent&#8217;s right to speak while opposing what he says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/14407/aclu-of-iowa-supports-gay-marriage-opponents-right-to-speak-while-opposing-what-he-says/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14407/aclu-of-iowa-supports-gay-marriage-opponents-right-to-speak-while-opposing-what-he-says</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slincoln</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14407/aclu-of-iowa-supports-gay-marriage-opponents-right-to-speak-while-opposing-what-he-says/comment-page-1#comment-24229</link>
		<dc:creator>slincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14407#comment-24229</guid>
		<description>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slincoln</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14407/aclu-of-iowa-supports-gay-marriage-opponents-right-to-speak-while-opposing-what-he-says/comment-page-1#comment-19731</link>
		<dc:creator>slincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14407#comment-19731</guid>
		<description>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slincoln</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14407/aclu-of-iowa-supports-gay-marriage-opponents-right-to-speak-while-opposing-what-he-says/comment-page-1#comment-16561</link>
		<dc:creator>slincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14407#comment-16561</guid>
		<description>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding Bartz in violation of ethics laws is not taking away his right to free speech.  He can argue whatever he wants about same sex couples getting married, but when he decides to use his taxpayer-supported position to encourage people to break the law, that crosses the line and is no longer protected by the 1st Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

