Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Hawkeye Poll Shows Continued Lead For Clinton, Romney

By Jay Wagner | 10.29.07 | 12:18 pm

Mitt Romney remains the clear front-runner in Iowa in a new University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll of probable caucus voters shows. Meanwhile, the poll shows that a dip in John Edwards’ numbers have allowed Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to tighten their holds on the No. 1 and No. 2 spots.

The new poll also confirms a surge by Republican Mike Huckabee who is enjoying growing support among Evangelical Christians. Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson are in a near-tie for second place, the poll shows.

Although Giuliani leads in most national polls, Romney is the preference of 36.2 percent of likely voters in the upcoming Republican caucus, with Giuliani second at 13.1 percent, Huckabee third with 12.8 percent and Thompson fourth at 11.4 percent. John McCain has 6.0 percent. The poll has a margin of error of 5.8 percent.

The poll also delivers some less obvious positive news for the Romney camp. Many polls have shown that despite the money Romney has invested in the state, his level of support has remained steady and, in some polls, even eroded during the last six months. The Hawkeye Poll, however, indicated that Romney has actually padded his lead in the state by eight points since the last survey.
While Romney leads in all demographic groups, there is evidence Huckabee is becoming a focus for Evangelical Christians. Caucus-goers who say they are “born again” or “Evangelical” are much more likely to support Huckabee than are those who are not. Huckabee is a strong second to Romney with this group, 21.2 percent to 29.2 percent, respectively. Among Republicans who do not consider themselves Evangelical, Huckabee receives only 6.4 percent, while Romney has 41.1 percent.
About 44 percent of Republican caucus-goers consider themselves born again or Evangelical, but they appear no more or less likely to caucus than those who do not, the poll shows.

Despite Romney’s lead, the race remains somewhat fluid among Republicans. In addition to the nearly 15 percent of Republicans who do not have a candidate preference, many say they remain at least somewhat likely to change their mind. Nearly 61 percent are somewhat likely to change, while another 8.4 percent are very likely. Only 28.9 percent say they will not change.

On the Democratic front, after declining between March and August, Clinton’s support has returned to March levels among likely caucus-goers while Obama’s support has also increased. Edwards, on the other hand, continues to see a decline in the number of likely caucus-goers who say he is their candidate.

Overall,  Hillary Clinton leads with 28.9 percent, followed by Barack Obama with 26.6 percent, John Edwards with 20 percent, Bill Richardson with 7.2 percent and Joe Biden with 5.3 percent.
The study shows that Clinton’s strength in the poll comes from her support among women, 33 percent for Clinton compared to 26.5 for Obama and 16.8 percent for Edwards. The poll shows the order reverses with men, where Obama leads 26.7 percent to Edwards at 25 percent and Clinton at 22.5 percent.

Among Democrats polled, 39.6 percent say they are not at all likely to change their minds on who to support, up from 33.6 percent in August. While 57.5 percent of Democrats now say they are somewhat or very likely to change their mind, this is down from 65.2 percent in August, indicating that while the race remains fluid, Democratic caucus-goers are now beginning to settle on their choices. Only 7.9 percent say they are very likely to change.

Comments

  • Cyclone Conservatives

    Don This is not a credible poll.

  • Mark Langgin

    Ok, that’s a great comment Don, that’s quite the insightful commentary coming from the Cyclone Conservative.  I don’t think that the poll is necessarily a great measure against other polls.  The methodology is much more open ended.

    As Mark Blumenthal over at Pollster.Com says:

    Readers should consider that the methodology of this survey, as in August, is different from most of the other Iowa caucus surveys we have seen. According to Professor David Redlawski, who spoke at a Washington press briefing this morning, [...snip...] this most recent survey used essentially the same methodology as their August survey. That is, it used an open-ended vote question, the same screening questions and sampled from a list of telephone numbers drawn from listed telephone directories (i.e. not a registered voter list and not using a random digit dial methodology).

    So, when looking at this data it’s important to interpret trends – not absolute numbers.  I think the internals to the poll are even more interesting.  Over at the Kevin McCarthy page:

    The new University of Iowa “Hawkeye Poll” show Senator Joe Biden making gains since August. Biden was polling at less than 1% support in August and is now pulling close to Richardson with 5.3% in the latest polling done of likely Iowa caucus attendees.

    Biden is polling well ahead of Richardson amongst likely caucus goers over 61 years of age – coming in with 9.9% support vs. Richardson’s 4.1% amongst this key caucus demographic.

  • desmoinesdem

    they took random phone numbers Then said people who told them they would caucus were likely caucus-goers.

    Sorry, the sample should be drawn at the very least from registered Ds and Rs–not from random phone numbers.

    Preferably from people who have caucused or at least voted in a primary before.

    Anyone can tell you on the phone that they will caucus. But will they leave their homes for two hours on a cold January night right after the holidays? I am skeptical.

  • Cyclone Conservatives

    Don This is not a credible poll.

  • Mark Langgin

    Ok, that's a great comment Don, that's quite the insightful commentary coming from the Cyclone Conservative.  I don't think that the poll is necessarily a great measure against other polls.  The methodology is much more open ended.

    As Mark Blumenthal over at Pollster.Com says:

    Readers should consider that the methodology of this survey, as in August, is different from most of the other Iowa caucus surveys we have seen. According to Professor David Redlawski, who spoke at a Washington press briefing this morning, [...snip...] this most recent survey used essentially the same methodology as their August survey. That is, it used an open-ended vote question, the same screening questions and sampled from a list of telephone numbers drawn from listed telephone directories (i.e. not a registered voter list and not using a random digit dial methodology).

    So, when looking at this data it's important to interpret trends – not absolute numbers.  I think the internals to the poll are even more interesting.  Over at the Kevin McCarthy page:

    The new University of Iowa “Hawkeye Poll” show Senator Joe Biden making gains since August. Biden was polling at less than 1% support in August and is now pulling close to Richardson with 5.3% in the latest polling done of likely Iowa caucus attendees.

    Biden is polling well ahead of Richardson amongst likely caucus goers over 61 years of age – coming in with 9.9% support vs. Richardson's 4.1% amongst this key caucus demographic.

  • desmoinesdem

    they took random phone numbers Then said people who told them they would caucus were likely caucus-goers.

    Sorry, the sample should be drawn at the very least from registered Ds and Rs–not from random phone numbers.

    Preferably from people who have caucused or at least voted in a primary before.

    Anyone can tell you on the phone that they will caucus. But will they leave their homes for two hours on a cold January night right after the holidays? I am skeptical.

  • Mark Langgin

    Again… It's about trends.  I agree that the poll doesn't fit “traditional” polling methodology.  Yet it does still serve as a decent gauge of who will be each caucusgoer's “#1″ choice at this point – a snapshot in time.  Since the poll used the same methodology as the polling they did in August you can still discern trends.  Plus, the numbers seem to correspond with what people have been finding in other polls – along the trend lines at least.

    They also took the data they collected from the random telephone sample and cross-referenced with voter registration data so they could find out who caucused in 2004 as well.  In particular they found that Edwards voters are much more likely to be past voters in the Democratic caucus.

  • Anonymous

    Iowa has been getting such positive press lately – from Star Trek AND the president! Go Hawkeye State!

  • Mark Langgin

    Again… It’s about trends.  I agree that the poll doesn’t fit “traditional” polling methodology.  Yet it does still serve as a decent gauge of who will be each caucusgoer’s “#1″ choice at this point – a snapshot in time.  Since the poll used the same methodology as the polling they did in August you can still discern trends.  Plus, the numbers seem to correspond with what people have been finding in other polls – along the trend lines at least.

    They also took the data they collected from the random telephone sample and cross-referenced with voter registration data so they could find out who caucused in 2004 as well.  In particular they found that Edwards voters are much more likely to be past voters in the Democratic caucus.

Categories & Tags: |

Switch to our mobile site