Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

King’s D.C. tax credit a clerical error

By Jason Hancock | 03.27.09 | 12:36 pm

An improper tax deduction received by Rep. Steve King, R-Kiron, is the result of a mistake by the property tax department for the District of Columbia, according to a letter from the agency provided to The Des Moines Register.

Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported Wednesday that King, along with three other members of Congress, was improperly receiving a D.C. homestead tax credit, which is not supposed to be available to those who claim residency in another state even if they have a home in the nation’s capitol.

King told Roll Call the local tax agency must have made a mistake, and Thursday provided a letter to The Register confirming his statement.

Records reflect that King’s property “has been inadvertently receiving the homestead deduction,” Richie McKeithen, director of the real property tax administration for the District of Columbia, said in a letter to King dated Thursday.

King has agreed to pay the back taxes, according to his spokesman.

The news of King’s improper tax break had become a hot topic of conversation in newspapers and blogs around the state. The confusion surrounds the fact that in Iowa, a homestead deduction has to be specifically requested when buying a new home. Some also wondered how King could not know he was receiving the exemption, since it is noted on the D.C. property tax bills homeowners receive twice a year, including a calculation of any savings.

McKeithen’s letter said the homestead deduction most likely occurred by someone in the D.C. office transfering it to King from the previous owner.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • Peggy2

    “The news of King’s improper tax break had become a hot topic of conversation in newspapers and blogs around the state. The confusion surrounds the fact that in Iowa, a homestead deduction has to be specifically requested when buying a new home. Some also wondered how King could not know he was receiving the exemption, since it is noted on the D.C. property tax bills homeowners receive twice a year, including a calculation of any savings.” – Jason Hancock

    Is this supposed to be a correction, Jason, or are you still clinging to your desperate hope that someday the mud you hurl at Congressman King will actually stick?

    What legitimate journalist provides links to other sites' misreported stories in his retraction piece?

  • nategreene11

    As proof once again…journalism is dead. Way to go Iowa Independent – regurgitating a false story. I'm sure Tim Gill is proud of you!

  • Sarahf

    Let's see, they reported Roll Call said King got the tax break when he shouldn't have (fact). King did get the tax break when he shouldn't have (fact). They quoted King as saying it was a mistake, but refusing to elaborate (fact). They said a similar mistake was made in 2005 (fact).

    Now they are saying he gave a letter to the Register to verify his story (fact). They say several newspapers and blogs were talking about it before he verified his story(fact). They said the way Iowa does it's homestead credit is different, which caused the confusion (fact).

    They never said he did anything illegal, nor did they say anything negative about Rep. King.

    What correction were you wanting again?

    • Peggy2

      “The earth is not flat, but here are the thoughts of some people who thought it to be true!”

      What qualifications, exactly, are required to work for CIM? Walking Tim Gill's dogs? Washing his Prius? What?

  • Peggy2

    “The earth is not flat, but here are the thoughts of some people who thought it to be true!”

    What qualifications, exactly, are required to work for CIM? Walking Tim Gill's dogs? Washing his Prius? What?

  • Peggy2

    Get real, Chase. Hancock went the extra mile to reinforce the Steve King-is-a-tax-cheat implication. Remember this portion of Jason's original story?

    “One group upset with King is supporters of allowing the nation’s capitol voting rights in the U.S. House. Earlier this month, the Iowa Republican helped stall a bill granting those rights by attaching an amendment gutting the city’s gun laws. District-based blog DCist chided King for his misstep.”

    “King comes out looking worst of the bunch — not only is he seemingly cheating on his taxes, but he also helped stall the recent D.C. voting rights bill. Tsk tsk.”

    Compare this to your reporting on the Marshall Clemons story. You delayed and dragged your feet all the way to the truth, and then you were castigated by your Ia Indy colleague, T.M. Lindsey, for relying on the Iowa Republican (gasp!) for your information.

    Calling your site “Iowa Independent” is false advertising.

  • Sarahf

    Oh Peggy, you get yourself all worked up any time anyone writes anything about Steve King, but you seldom bother to read what they wrote. Can't say you're not passionate, but that only goes so far.

  • Peggy2

    Sarah,

    Maybe if you and your equally inept friends at CIM could print something truthful about Congressman King, I wouldn't have to worry about it.

    “Center for Activist Media” has a nice ring to it.

  • Peggy2

    “The news of King’s improper tax break had become a hot topic of conversation in newspapers and blogs around the state. The confusion surrounds the fact that in Iowa, a homestead deduction has to be specifically requested when buying a new home. Some also wondered how King could not know he was receiving the exemption, since it is noted on the D.C. property tax bills homeowners receive twice a year, including a calculation of any savings.” – Jason Hancock

    Is this supposed to be a correction, Jason, or are you still clinging to your desperate hope that someday the mud you hurl at Congressman King will actually stick?

    What legitimate journalist provides links to other sites' misreported stories in his retraction piece?

  • nategreene11

    As proof once again…journalism is dead. Way to go Iowa Independent – regurgitating a false story. I'm sure Tim Gill is proud of you!

  • http://newjournalist.org CIM Network

    We picked up a report from Roll Call, one of the more reputable publications in Washington. Our original story included evidence from Roll Call and Rep. King's response to the story. Today, he got Washington DC to confirm his story. But that doesn't make the original report, that King was getting a tax break that he didn't qualify for, false. It just means that his defense, which we had already printed, was true. — Chase Martyn

    • Peggy2

      Get real, Chase. Hancock went the extra mile to reinforce the Steve King-is-a-tax-cheat implication. Remember this portion of Jason's original story?

      “One group upset with King is supporters of allowing the nation’s capitol voting rights in the U.S. House. Earlier this month, the Iowa Republican helped stall a bill granting those rights by attaching an amendment gutting the city’s gun laws. District-based blog DCist chided King for his misstep.”

      “King comes out looking worst of the bunch — not only is he seemingly cheating on his taxes, but he also helped stall the recent D.C. voting rights bill. Tsk tsk.”

      Compare this to your reporting on the Marshall Clemons story. You delayed and dragged your feet all the way to the truth, and then you were castigated by your Ia Indy colleague, T.M. Lindsey, for relying on the Iowa Republican (gasp!) for your information.

      Calling your site “Iowa Independent” is false advertising.

      • Sarahf

        Oh Peggy, you get yourself all worked up any time anyone writes anything about Steve King, but you seldom bother to read what they wrote. Can't say you're not passionate, but that only goes so far.

        • Peggy2

          Sarah,

          Maybe if you and your equally inept friends at CIM could print something truthful about Congressman King, I wouldn't have to worry about it.

          “Center for Activist Media” has a nice ring to it.

  • Sarahf

    Let's see, they reported Roll Call said King got the tax break when he shouldn't have (fact). King did get the tax break when he shouldn't have (fact). They quoted King as saying it was a mistake, but refusing to elaborate (fact). They said a similar mistake was made in 2005 (fact).

    Now they are saying he gave a letter to the Register to verify his story (fact). They say several newspapers and blogs were talking about it before he verified his story(fact). They said the way Iowa does it's homestead credit is different, which caused the confusion (fact).

    They never said he did anything illegal, nor did they say anything negative about Rep. King.

    What correction were you wanting again?

  • Peggy2

    “The earth is not flat, but here are the thoughts of some people who thought it to be true!”

    What qualifications, exactly, are required to work for CIM? Walking Tim Gill's dogs? Washing his Prius? What?

  • Peggy2

    Get real, Chase. Hancock went the extra mile to reinforce the Steve King-is-a-tax-cheat implication. Remember this portion of Jason's original story?

    “One group upset with King is supporters of allowing the nation’s capitol voting rights in the U.S. House. Earlier this month, the Iowa Republican helped stall a bill granting those rights by attaching an amendment gutting the city’s gun laws. District-based blog DCist chided King for his misstep.”

    “King comes out looking worst of the bunch — not only is he seemingly cheating on his taxes, but he also helped stall the recent D.C. voting rights bill. Tsk tsk.”

    Compare this to your reporting on the Marshall Clemons story. You delayed and dragged your feet all the way to the truth, and then you were castigated by your Ia Indy colleague, T.M. Lindsey, for relying on the Iowa Republican (gasp!) for your information.

    Calling your site “Iowa Independent” is false advertising.

  • Sarahf

    Oh Peggy, you get yourself all worked up any time anyone writes anything about Steve King, but you seldom bother to read what they wrote. Can't say you're not passionate, but that only goes so far.

  • Peggy2

    Sarah,

    Maybe if you and your equally inept friends at CIM could print something truthful about Congressman King, I wouldn't have to worry about it.

    “Center for Activist Media” has a nice ring to it.

Switch to our mobile site