Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Michigan, Iowa and the Games the Politicos Play

By Lynda Waddington | 10.11.07 | 3:09 pm

Iowans are by and large straightforward people. Given that, it should come as no surprise that to the average Iowan, the Michigan ballot situation seems pretty cut and dried: Democratic presidential hopefuls who honor their four-state pledge and support the nomination calendar won’t be on the Wolverine State’s ballot. As with most things in life, and especially politics, the situation is more complicated.

Five individuals connected to five different campaigns have confirmed — but only under condition of anonymity — that the situation that developed in connection with the Michigan ballot is not at all as it appears on the surface. The campaign for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, arguably fearing a poor showing in Michigan, reached out to the others with a desire of leaving New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton as the only candidate on the ballot. The hope was that such a move would provide one more political obstacle for the Clinton campaign to overcome in Iowa.

Despite speaking in confidence, sources were quick to point out that the discussions were not the final deciding factor when candidates’ names were removed from the ballot.

“Yes, such discussion did take place,” said one national staffer, “but that doesn’t mean we were influenced by it. The decision to pull from the Michigan ballot — or other renegade states’ ballots, for that matter — was made the day we signed the pledge with the four early states.”

A contact within a second campaign agreed.

“The belief that this would somehow hurt front-running Clinton in Iowa was icing on an already sweet cake,” he said. “The real meal, however, is the good will the move generates not only in Iowa, but in all the states who are playing by the DNC rules and that don’t appreciate all of this jumping and chaos.”

Candidates who remain on the Michigan ballot are Clinton, Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel and (not by his own choosing) Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich. A person close to the Dodd campaign said the push to make Clinton look bad in Iowa and the feeling of being played “like a political pawn” were items discussed by the campaign. But, standing on principle isn’t always a comfortable position.

“The campaign did what it thought was right,” the source said. “The hope is, of course, that since we were the first to sign the pledge letter and that because we have been so adamant in support of the first states — especially Iowa — that those who caucus and vote in the early states will know we support them and their place in the process.”

To further drive home their support of Iowa being first, the Dodd campaign is planning several multi-day trips by the senator to the state. Another campaign staff person has estimated that Dodd will be on the ground in Iowa more than 20 days each month between now and caucus night.

It is undoubtedly a gamble for the Dodd campaign. The residents of Iowa and New Hampshire are known for their tenacity when it comes to their status of first caucus and primary in the nation. But Dodd isn’t the only candidate with his dice on the table.

Clinton, who recently took the lead in Iowa polling, must try to balance opinions in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada with those of voters in other states. While a first-place finish in Iowa can’t really provide her the boost it could to other candidates, a poor showing would put a damper on her nearly established inaugural parade across the nation.

The remaining campaigns have just as much — if not more — at stake. For them, the cards are on the table, and it’s Iowa or bust. Further, there are some campaigns who may now have to shrug off perceptions by one of the top-tier campaigns that they will act more as allies than as foes — so long as Clinton is the target.

Follow Lynda Waddington on Twitter


Comments

  • Wants2know

    What does Iowa’s Obama Guru say about this? Wouldn’t Gordon Fischer know what really happened?

  • Jessica

    This doesn’t really make sense Hillary could have at anytime pulled her name off of the ballot and none of the other candidates could have stopped her so I guess I really don’t understand this as a motivation.

  • ItsTimeToTurnThePage

    Clinton is Accountable for her own decisions Sen. Clinton and Sen. Dodd have both decided to ignore the DNC and leave their name on the MI ballot.

    Sen. Clinton can and should remove her name from the MI ballot.  Why hasn’t she?

    Sen. Clinton wants to win at any cost.  Her word means nothing.  She can’t be trusted.  She’s dishonest.  She has no integrity.  She has no honor.

    Sen. Clinton has made the decision she believes to be best for her and her alone.  She could care less about anyone else.  Don’t blame others for Sen. Clinton’s lack of honor.

  • Danielle Clarke

    If all the candidates listen to Barack then If all the candidates listen to Barack then

    Barack is doing great and they will all throw their support his way hmmmm

    So Hillary get Dodds support OHHH and Barack gets the rest ahhhh :)

    Not sure this is the truth as reported here

  • DiamondEbs

    This comment is so laughable Well, Barack Obama represents a Democratic Party of the future, not one of the past. As the future of the Democratic Party,  I’m not surprised at the amount of influence he commands.

    However, this statememnt is just laughable:

    “The campaign for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, arguably fearing a poor showing in Michigan, reached out to the others …”

    It’s laughable to suggest that Obama was seeking help from the other campaigns. Why don’t you just tell us that the other campaigns have agreed to campaign for Obama?

  • DCJoe

    Joe Real visionary, that Obama, having the guts to pull his name off a ballot in a state where he is trailing by more than 20%.  And by the way, if any of these four candidates had decided weeks ago when they first signed the pledge to take their names off the MI ballot, why do you suppose that each and every one of them waited until the last possible moment to do it?

  • Karol Searle

    why doesn’t she remove her name from MI ballog What is stopping Clinton from removing her name from the Michigan ballot?  Everything is a conspiracy against the Clintons. 

  • Tamara

    The idea that any state should have the right to be first The whole premise that Iowa politicians have been operating on that they or any other state has a right to vote first is bogus and against the basic democratic principles that this country was founded on.  Any state has the right to hold it’s primary any time it wants to, and any candidate who thinks otherwise is off my list for the general election.  I haven’t decided yet if I won’t vote at all, or if I will write in Al Gore, even though, by Michigan law, a write in vote won’t be counted unless the candidate signs up, but I know I won’t vote for anybody who doesn’t acknowledge Michigan’s right to vote anytime it wants to!

  • Oakland

    Iowa is not sacred. Iowa does not represent the rest of the country, and many of us are sick and tired of Iowa and NH thinking they are the “chosen ones”.  You guys keep picking losers, and Hillary is just another example of sticking another freaking establishment corporatist into office.  You guys need to get a clue.

  • Wants2know

    What does Iowa's Obama Guru say about this? Wouldn't Gordon Fischer know what really happened?

  • Jessica

    This doesn't really make sense Hillary could have at anytime pulled her name off of the ballot and none of the other candidates could have stopped her so I guess I really don't understand this as a motivation.

  • ItsTimeToTurnThePage

    Clinton is Accountable for her own decisions Sen. Clinton and Sen. Dodd have both decided to ignore the DNC and leave their name on the MI ballot.

    Sen. Clinton can and should remove her name from the MI ballot.  Why hasn't she?

    Sen. Clinton wants to win at any cost.  Her word means nothing.  She can't be trusted.  She's dishonest.  She has no integrity.  She has no honor.

    Sen. Clinton has made the decision she believes to be best for her and her alone.  She could care less about anyone else.  Don't blame others for Sen. Clinton's lack of honor.

  • Danielle Clarke

    If all the candidates listen to Barack then If all the candidates listen to Barack then

    Barack is doing great and they will all throw their support his way hmmmm

    So Hillary get Dodds support OHHH and Barack gets the rest ahhhh :)

    Not sure this is the truth as reported here

  • DiamondEbs

    This comment is so laughable Well, Barack Obama represents a Democratic Party of the future, not one of the past. As the future of the Democratic Party,  I'm not surprised at the amount of influence he commands.

    However, this statememnt is just laughable:

    “The campaign for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, arguably fearing a poor showing in Michigan, reached out to the others …”

    It's laughable to suggest that Obama was seeking help from the other campaigns. Why don't you just tell us that the other campaigns have agreed to campaign for Obama?

  • DCJoe

    Joe Real visionary, that Obama, having the guts to pull his name off a ballot in a state where he is trailing by more than 20%.  And by the way, if any of these four candidates had decided weeks ago when they first signed the pledge to take their names off the MI ballot, why do you suppose that each and every one of them waited until the last possible moment to do it?

  • Karol Searle

    why doesn't she remove her name from MI ballog What is stopping Clinton from removing her name from the Michigan ballot?  Everything is a conspiracy against the Clintons. 

  • IADEM

    The MI ballot is locked Michigan has some senseless election laws that may have made a little more sense when it took months to produce ballots and program mechanical voting machines.  Last Tuesday was the deadline for candidates to remove thier names from the Michigan ballot.  While they were busy tinkering with thier election date, the Michigan legislature should have changed thier removal deadline to reflect the modern era where Kinko's can produce ballots in a matter of days.

  • Xavier

    Tell that to Michigan voters The majority of the Michigan Democratic Party had nothing to do with the decision to move the date up and are not essentially disenfranchised.

    Hillary was right — we're going to have to fight for Michigan in November 2008 if we want to be in the White House in 2009, so it's pretty darn stupid to make MI voters apathetic, if not angry, with the Democratic party.

  • Tamara

    “not” disenfranchised? I think you probably mean “now” disenfranchised.  Which is terribly hypocritical of those in the DNC that are responsible for this, and the candidates, since it has been such an issue in the Democratic Party regarding whether votes are all counted properly, hanging chads and all that.  Now they have disenfranched Michigan purposefully, and not by accident.

  • Tamara

    The idea that any state should have the right to be first The whole premise that Iowa politicians have been operating on that they or any other state has a right to vote first is bogus and against the basic democratic principles that this country was founded on.  Any state has the right to hold it's primary any time it wants to, and any candidate who thinks otherwise is off my list for the general election.  I haven't decided yet if I won't vote at all, or if I will write in Al Gore, even though, by Michigan law, a write in vote won't be counted unless the candidate signs up, but I know I won't vote for anybody who doesn't acknowledge Michigan's right to vote anytime it wants to!

  • Oakland

    Iowa is not sacred. Iowa does not represent the rest of the country, and many of us are sick and tired of Iowa and NH thinking they are the “chosen ones”.  You guys keep picking losers, and Hillary is just another example of sticking another freaking establishment corporatist into office.  You guys need to get a clue.

  • IADEM

    The MI ballot is locked Michigan has some senseless election laws that may have made a little more sense when it took months to produce ballots and program mechanical voting machines.  Last Tuesday was the deadline for candidates to remove thier names from the Michigan ballot.  While they were busy tinkering with thier election date, the Michigan legislature should have changed thier removal deadline to reflect the modern era where Kinko’s can produce ballots in a matter of days.

  • Xavier

    Tell that to Michigan voters The majority of the Michigan Democratic Party had nothing to do with the decision to move the date up and are not essentially disenfranchised.

    Hillary was right — we’re going to have to fight for Michigan in November 2008 if we want to be in the White House in 2009, so it’s pretty darn stupid to make MI voters apathetic, if not angry, with the Democratic party.

  • Tamara

    “not” disenfranchised? I think you probably mean “now” disenfranchised.  Which is terribly hypocritical of those in the DNC that are responsible for this, and the candidates, since it has been such an issue in the Democratic Party regarding whether votes are all counted properly, hanging chads and all that.  Now they have disenfranched Michigan purposefully, and not by accident.

Switch to our mobile site