Comments on: King critical of spending for ‘pro-amnesty organization’

By: Daddyfats61

Daddyfats61 — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:25:24 +0000

Isn't America just grand what other country could an illegal alien come into and demand civil rights,sue American citizens for interfering with their civil rights when caught invading America through their property.Having the United States contribute 950,000 dollars to an organization who demands amnesty for law breakers.Thank “YOU” Mr. CHANGE President for screwing America.

By: Daddyfats61

Daddyfats61 — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:25:24 +0000

By: Daddyfats61

Daddyfats61 — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:25:24 +0000

By: Kathleen3

Kathleen3 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:16:58 +0000

I am opposed to all earmarks. Recognizing the fact the Congress is totally beholden to special interest groups rather than the interests of their constituents, I would prefer to see my tax dollars spent to build roads and bridges than to fund a radical, anti-American organization, such as LaRaza. LaRaza may attempt to convince us that the monies will be used for housing and community development (ala ACORN!); however, those who closely follow this organization know full well that the additional millions of dollars they acquire as the result of shaking down large businesses is used to fund marches through our tax-paid streets by illegal aliens and their supporters, most dressed in garb that is similar to that worn by terrorists, while they hold up clenched fists or carry foreign flags and scream obscenities at any and everyone who attempts to uphold our laws. The remainder is spent on lobbying Congress to further expand LaRaza's role by passing legislation that will turn this country into a mirror image of the third world countries the illegals left behind.